Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is a) SUPERB, and b) a perfect example of the Dan Brown Code[1]. [1] http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000844.h...
For more on Dan Brown, see this hilarious parody: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/authors/dont-make-fun-of-r...
Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
21–30 of 154 posts
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#22And obvious trait of all those is too much postmodernism. Instead of trying to lay out a story about human beings, books start name-dropping or being smart from the line 1. Trying to claim too much context that they don't own but obviously going to exploit.
This is a contest where contestants intentionally set out to write the worst opening sentence possible.
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
And what makes it even funnier is that they all sound like they could be from a real Dan Brown novel.
Or Charles Stross, or Peter Watts. A lot of modern prose starts with illusions of grandeur and name-dropping.
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#24The link currently points to the 2019 winners, the correct one is: https://www.bulwer-lytton.com/2022
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#25Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#26The link currently points to the 2019 winners, the correct one is: https://www.bulwer-lytton.com/2022
Honestly i think the 2019 grand winner is the best still
>2019 Grand Prize
>Space Fleet Commander Brad Brad sat in silence, surrounded by a slowly dissipating cloud of smoke, maintaining the same forlorn frown that had been fixed upon his face since he’d accidentally destroyed the phenomenon known as time, thirteen inches ago.
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#27And obvious trait of all those is too much postmodernism. Instead of trying to lay out a story about human beings, books start name-dropping or being smart from the line 1. Trying to claim too much context that they don't own but obviously going to exploit.
Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#28Re: Worst Opening Sentences of 2022
#29And obvious trait of all those is too much postmodernism. Instead of trying to lay out a story about human beings, books start name-dropping or being smart from the line 1. Trying to claim too much context that they don't own but obviously going to exploit.
This comment is itself a beautiful example of postmodernism. Well, at least my incredibly naive idea of what postmodernism is. I do it that way, intentionally.