Live data from Hacker News

Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

twitter.com

901–910 of 1001 posts

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#901

it truly is bizarre how many fanboys came here to post irrelevant and incorrect information to defend Musk doing a big 180 on a supposed deeply held principle of his because he got personally upset about someone making him look childish.

it truly is bizarre how many haters came here to post irrelevant and incorrect information to attack Musk doing a change in twitter policy because of reasons we don't know.

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#903

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk has now included a tweet seemingly trying to dox the stalker, including their license plate. How can he immediately turn from "people shouldn't post publicly available information that can be abusable" to posting someone's abusable public information?

Link to the tweet? I can't find it.

It's part of the thread in the post I'm responding to, but here https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603235998263123969

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#904
post #672

Elon posted some info[0] that gives it some context: "Last night, car carrying lil X in LA was followed by crazy stalker (thinking it was me), who later blocked car from moving & climbed onto hood. Legal action is being taken against Sweeney & organizations who supported harm to my family." Make that what you will. [0]: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944

How is tracking a jet allowing a stalker to stalk a car?

You noticed that slight of hand too? Go back to the original HN thread on this ban and you’ll find a poster asking for another “narrative” besides Musk being a rank hypocrite. This is that narrative his followers were looking for.

The slight of hand here is to conflate the car and the plane and the dates. This allows his followers to push a “it was for his child’s safety!” argument, in which yet again Elon Musk uses his children as a prop to avoid critical examination of his new story. Which, as you and others point out, falls apart due to the timing of the last tweet and the purported incident.

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#905

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because he's a terrible person who doesn't really care for anyone or anything other than himself and his giant pile of gold.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33998145

It's possible to do great things and still be a terrible person. I know some people might find it hard to believe but it's also possible for people to change as they age/get richer/get more powerful/get less powerful/get poorer etc. Elon 10 years ago isn't Elon today.

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#906

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The flight information that twitter account was using is publically available and required by law to BE public. https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7zygg/twitter-bans-elon-mus... "Sweeney has been using sites such as ADS-B Exchange to track the movements of private jets blogging to celebrities, tech billionaires, and Russian oligarchs for years now. By law, the movement of these plans is publicly available information.…

So to be clear, this info is already public but a lack of web scraping ability prevents the low end stalkers from stalking without the twitter account.

Maybe they know how to use Google?

https://www.google.com/search?q=a835af

And if you don't have the registration that one more search. All of this information is public and that goes for pretty much all aircraft.

If the bar is 'low end stalkers that don't have internet' then yes, it will make a difference.

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#907
post #356

Elon posted some info[0] that gives it some context: "Last night, car carrying lil X in LA was followed by crazy stalker (thinking it was me), who later blocked car from moving & climbed onto hood. Legal action is being taken against Sweeney & organizations who supported harm to my family." Make that what you will. [0]: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944

My guess is the story is completely made up or staged.

yeah, this seems fake as hell. the coincidental timing, the clumsy on-the-nose nature of this incident, the "perp" calmly letting the guy take video of his (paper?) license plate...in what appears to be a parking lot? come on.

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#908
Anyone know how much of a headache it would be to just lease an aircraft short term for these kinds of flights to avoid having a specific jet tied to his identity?

I'm assuming it's a logistical issue more than a financial one, or else more people would do it. (or private jetters can't abide to not have their own aircraft, always available and set up the way they like it)

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#909
post #879

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Musk’s son, X Æ A-12 I heard that he gave his child a strange name, but... that is just something else. On topic: I don't see how a flight location could be shown to cause that event. If I told you that I was arriving somewhere at LAX at around 0900 could you find me?

Are you flying in on your own private jet and are you among the richest most well-known people in the world?

So privacy protection only applies to the rich?

Re: Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

#910

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The flight information that twitter account was using is publically available and required by law to BE public. https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7zygg/twitter-bans-elon-mus... "Sweeney has been using sites such as ADS-B Exchange to track the movements of private jets blogging to celebrities, tech billionaires, and Russian oligarchs for years now. By law, the movement of these plans is publicly available information.…

So to be clear, this info is already public but a lack of web scraping ability prevents the low end stalkers from stalking without the twitter account.

They can just check the website.
Post reply on HN