Live data from Hacker News

Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

minbrowser.org

181–190 of 197 posts

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#181
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can we have a link to your chromium build with unloading? Or is it private?

Probably this (from parhamm’s profile) https://synth.app/

That's interesting, I'll have to go take a deeper look. Seems similar to Memex (WorldBrain)

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#182
post #77
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Often people distinguish between "command-line interfaces" (CLI) and "text user interfaces" (TUI). So "sed" is a CLI program, while vim is a TUI program. But it's also common to use "CLI" to include "TUI" programs, so I don't think your parent is wrong.

> But it's also common to use "CLI" to include "TUI" programs [...]. It is indeed common, and (IMO) it is harmful, as TUI programs are just GUI programs in disguise. They do have two unique strengths: readily accessible over a serial console or an SSH session; and being the lowest common denominator of GUI programming. But they don't share any of the typical (desirable) qualities of CLI programs; typically, any CLI f…

Thank you for drawing this distinction. I had not mentally realized the difference before, this makes me interested in trying TUI programs. Will go check lynx out today.

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#183

There needs to be a word for these projects that are a UI layer on top of a preexisting browser engine. Calling it a "new browser" is a little confusing.

Agreed. It's the same when someone packages the Linux kernel + some user space apps and calls it a "new Operating System".

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#184
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use kagi and had not even heard that they have their own browser. Why would why use that over one of the "big three" (FF/Chrome/Safari) with serious corporate security teams backing them? edit: Okay so it's webkit based, mac only, with built-in adblocking, which sounds nice, but honestly the idea that it can easily install extensions from both chrome and firefox sounds like a security nightmare to me. The fact that…

Why use kagi instead of the big 3? Google, Bing, Yandex? The companies with serious corporate security?

Much better search results. I recently been switching over myself.

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#185
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just downloaded FF this week and started using it as my primary browser as I start to transition from Chromium-based browsers. May I ask what you did to configure your browser that way (extensions/settings)? I like the look of it, and looking for ways to customize my setup.

uBlock Origin Sidebery QuickCut SingleFile Popup window Firefox Multi-Account Containers Copy All Tab Urls

Also:

Privacy Badger

Duck Duck Go Privacy Essentials

Privacy Possum

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you use Kagi for search, I'm assuming you've used their Orion browser [0], where you can set Kagi as default. Any reason why you didn't like it? [0] https://browser.kagi.com/

I use kagi and had not even heard that they have their own browser. Why would why use that over one of the "big three" (FF/Chrome/Safari) with serious corporate security teams backing them? edit: Okay so it's webkit based, mac only, with built-in adblocking, which sounds nice, but honestly the idea that it can easily install extensions from both chrome and firefox sounds like a security nightmare to me. The fact that…

Telemetry can be a security risk from a standpoint of exposing PII to a hostile actor.

Full text for reference: "Each request poses a security risk, no matter what information it sends, by potentially exposing your IP address and your browser fingerprint. Telemetry can also inadvertently leak personally identifiable information or corporate intelligence."

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#187
post #38
post #14

If you want fast and minimal, give Lynx a try. The original fast, minimal, privacy protected browser: https://lynx.invisible-island.net/current/

Lynx won't load Google Analytics scripts for sure. On the other hand your user agent string will be pretty much unique on the web. Partly because approximately no one is using Lynx and partly because Lynx leaks the versions of itself and just about every related library on your system in the UA string.

Fortunately you can easily override the UA string in Lynx: https://electrictoolbox.com/lynx-user-agent/

lynx -useragent="Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" -head -dump http://www.example.com/

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#188
Feels very snappy, but for me it's a non-starter: rejects connection to any site with a self-signed certificate, with no apparent means of override.

I get the security stance, but I configure a LOT of networking hardware via WebUI (eg: Palo Alto firewalls - self-signed from the factory) and this makes it next to useless.

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#189
One reason why mainstream web browsers are slow and "bulky" and use a lot of RAM is that they use all sorts of different exploit mitigation and hardening techniques.

One can only wonder what these alternatives do when they claim to be minimal and fast and worse, private. Can there really be privacy without security?

Re: Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

#190
post #96
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> instead of hating in web technologies just for the memes. Let’s nip this in the bud. The comment you’re replying to says “Everyone is complaining it is built in electron” but I’ve read every comment in this so far tiny thread and there is literally one comment complaining of it being Electron. > I didn't know Brave was an Electron app It’s not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33983708

Fwiw, I commented on this when there was only one or two comments on this, and all of them were complaining about electron.

One comment is insufficient to extrapolate to “everyone” or “all of them”. It sows discord and splits people into sides before there’s been any conversation.
Post reply on HN