Live data from Hacker News

The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

justice.gov

231–240 of 748 posts

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#231

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

White-collar crime prosecutions are notoriously time-consuming to prepare, by those standards this was remarkably swift.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#232

> "did transmit and cause to be transmitted by wire, radio, and television communication" Note to self: Remember to use only free-space lightwave communications to avoid committing wire fraud. Edit: Removed "fiber" because it looks too much like a wire and avoid being busted by outside1234!

The fact that they named the chat group channel for their executives (SBF, Caroline, others) "Wirefraud" is jawdropping.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#233

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

Tldr: Being stupid and naïve is not a good legal defense

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#234

Can we discus recovery? The Madoff trustee was able to recover something like 90% of the Madoff Ponzi. Alameda and FTX's real estate purchases have value, as do their VC investments, purchases of bank stock, etc. In other words, it's not all gone. My understanding is that even some of the political contributions can be clawed back. FTX's purchases of IOU's (i.e., crypto) that declined in value are not likely to be re…

Well the Madoff trustee's were able to see who received payouts from Madoff due to KYC rules. This allowed the trustee to go to people, most of whom were completely innocent, to ask the to give back some of the money they redeemed from Madoff.

FTX on the other hand has very few KYC docs so the trustees are left with wallet addresses.

Not sure how you contact a wallet address to ask for money back.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Is it really unfortunate? Yes; the system should not be biased towards guilt.

This is arguably biased towards justice, not guilt.

"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."[0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_ratio

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is a bit far fetched. He was the scion of famous law professors. He grew up around the law. To think he didn’t understand what the general public does about the law takes a special kind of … assumption that directly contradicts the obvious facts. He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not?

> He very likely knows more about the law than anyone on here. How could he not? There are actual lawyers on HN. I don't think proximity to lawyers makes one as knowledgeable as an actual one.

Lawyer up and shut up is the most basic advice. Ever.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#237

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

I really don't get this either. The guy has got to have a whole legion of lawyers. How are they allowing him to still speak publicly? I'm not even important and I've been consoled by company lawyers to not talk about stuff just "just in case". Yet this guy is is involved in one of the most high profile cases of all time screaming from the mountaintops about it. This whole FTX thing is very suspicious on all kinds of…

He ignores the lawyers.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do we have some examples of people who have amassed great real or perceived fortunes (and power) that have not become drunk on it? Musk on stage with Chapelle last night, Elizabeth Holmes, or SBF’s whole schtick, who are the ones who have kept their feet on the ground? What are the attributes of these others who don’t lose themselves in fawning attention and (sometimes short-lived) mountains of capital?

While not popular here, I would say Bezos has done a relatively good job of keeping his head amongst madness.

The popular wisdom is Amazon got into the video business entirely so Bezos could get dates with more actresses.

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#239

How anyone could look at this man's behavior over the last few weeks and not think he was on a fast track to a federal penitentiary is beyond me. A word to the unwise: If you have done something, anything, that you have a credible reason to believe the United States government thinks is illegal, shut up . Do not do any of the following: * Go on a podcast and talk about it * Go on a Twitter livestream and talk about i…

Probably also shouldn’t go back and delete semi-incriminating tweets[0] and try to avoid bot detection by tweeting one letter at a time[1] to keep the overall count the same (supposedly)[2].

[0] https://protos.com/sam-bankman-fried-caught-deleting-more-tw...

[1] https://fortune.com/crypto/2022/11/14/sam-bankman-fried-cryp...

[2] https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/ywz4j8/sam_...

Re: The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Indictment [pdf]

#240
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SBF's mother and father are both Standford law professors - so he knows all this. He has another angle. Maybe he was trying to taint the jury pool. He was up to something, but what?

Parents also not out of the woods. "The FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother and father, who teach at Stanford Law School, are under scrutiny for their connections to their son’s crypto business." - https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/12/technology/sbf-parents-ft...

I'm beginning to suspect this story is deeper than it looks.
Post reply on HN