>You correctly classified 22 of 30 (73%) images!
>You identified 12 of 12 (100%) AI-generated images.
>You identified 10 of 18 (55%) human-made images.
I draw regularly so that may have helped.
I managed to identify the AI images because they contained very AI-like mistakes (ie. poorly defined hands, inexact facial symmetry and shadows mismatching the object). When the image contained no obvious mistakes, it was more or less a coin flip for me, turns out the images without mistakes were probably all from humans.
Actually no, they were not cherry picked. Except for generations which did not match the prompt at all, I took every image that was created. For the human images, I just took things from Unsplash's and ArtStation's front pages. I clicked on those images without looking. Early next year I'll do a better quiz with more variety. This was a weekend project.
> Actually no, they were not cherry picked. Except for generations which did not match the prompt at all Second sentence describes process of selection. Is there difference in English between "filtered" / "selected" and "cherry picked"? Is "cherry picked" implying extreme filtering?
Filtered is the process of removing parts from the whole. Like how a water filter removes unwanted chemicals.
Selected means it was chosen. So after filtering you could make a selection from all or part of the remaining choices.
Cherry picked, means selected individually to meet a goal.
Selecting very bad results to be removed is almost the opposite of cherry picking. Cherry picking would be picking only the best images and presenting them, here they removed the worst images and showed the rest.
To be fair, to me, title should be more like are you able to tell cherry picked AI images from cherry picked human created images, since both clearly were selected to appear similarly picked to confuse a human in my opinion. No idea if that’s accurate, or even if it is, how to fix it, but one idea would be to get a list of the top ten search queries on a popular stock image site, then randomly pick an AI image and hu…
In reality, the use of AI images would be cherry picked, so this is a good test.
Good test would document its hypothesis, procedures, results, etc - and let the reader make their own decisions on its merits and their experience. 100% agree cherry picking is part of the process of generating AI content, though there’s no standard for evaluating the effectiveness of a system, creator, or audience at cherry picking good from bad generations. By pushing as much of the cherry picking to the audience, in my opinion it’s currently the best way to reduce assumptions and get better sense of what current state of the art is. As I mentioned before though, not sure what the answer is, just know it’s an issue, especially in this context in my opinion.
> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human ski…
You can often look at hand and ears and tell if it's AI or not.