Too many similar AI pics. Once I had spotted one anime pic, I got the rest. landscapes were tough though.
Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
41–50 of 107 posts
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#42surely if an AI can generate a "work of art", another AI should be able to detect the generation?
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#43> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images!
> You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images.
> You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images.
In general, I followed a pretty simple rule:
- If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections
- If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human skin)
Right now, SD-based art is trending towards a particular art style (anime-like & 3D-ish art), with little inherent ability towards creating subtle details in the background. It has a hard time drawing hands correctly, and often fails in drawing reflections. It also seems to have a hard time creating flat illustrations, or illustrations with limited color palates.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#44Results
You correctly classified 22 of 30 (73%) images!
You identified 15 of 18 (83%) AI-generated images.
You identified 7 of 12 (58%) human-made images.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#45I found it pretty easy once I started looking at context. For example, “would this person be wearing these kind of earrings?”, etc. Seems like AI does faces incredibly well, but misses the broader picture.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#46I was looking for tells, but things like landscapes or pictures where there's no hands or eyes tend not to have them as much.
They almost always do have them if you look close. I got 28 of 30 (93%) and correctly identified all AI images. Anime-style ones are obvious even outside of the hands/eyes because SD can only produce one really specific type of shading that is a mishmash of many anime styles but doesn't match any of them, pictures of houses always have some part of them deformed, pictures of landscapes tend to be the hardest to identify but usually have some detail in them that doesn't make sense when you actually think about it (one drawing of a forest had a subtle but consistent horizontal line behind the trees), etc.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#47> You correctly classified 22 of 30 (73%) images! Probably shouldn't show duplicate images in the same test, as that's just dropping the sample size. You may want to spell out exactly what you mean by "AI". If someone goes into photoshop and clicks "Edit › Sky Replacement.", it's not quite what I'd call human made.
I only had a duplicate cat and thought that it was a trick question
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#48I got 80%
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#4929/30. I've spent far too much time playing with StableDiffusion though, and those anime-style illustrations seemed too easy to pick out. I think the quiz could have been better with some more variety with the AI imagery.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#50> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human ski…
I got 25 correct, and the majority of that was just looking at hands and text to see if they were messed up.