Got 24/30 (80%)
Look at the hands, look for obvious repeating patterns in foliage, look for lines that don't connect right.
Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
51–60 of 107 posts
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#52> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human ski…
[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#53> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human ski…
I got 25 correct, and the majority of that was just looking at hands and text to see if they were messed up.
Text is a very good indication the photo is non-AI. Lots of AI generated images struggle with it, I don't know why.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#54> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human ski…
> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images!
> You identified 11 of 14 (78%) AI-generated images.
> You identified 15 of 16 (93%) human-made images.
Focal planes were another tell.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#5529/30, were not there yet :)
Thanks, this was a fun and revealing experience
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#56You're not even going to tell me which ones I got right?
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#5766% here
50%. No, I did not toss a coin.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#58To be fair, to me, title should be more like are you able to tell cherry picked AI images from cherry picked human created images, since both clearly were selected to appear similarly picked to confuse a human in my opinion. No idea if that’s accurate, or even if it is, how to fix it, but one idea would be to get a list of the top ten search queries on a popular stock image site, then randomly pick an AI image and hu…
In reality, the use of AI images would be cherry picked, so this is a good test.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#59Results
You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images!
You identified 10 of 12 (83%) AI-generated images.
You identified 16 of 18 (88%) human-made images.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#60>You correctly classified 28 of 30 (93%) images!
>You identified 16 of 17 (94%) AI-generated images.
>You identified 12 of 13 (92%) human-made images.
I'm pretty sure the errors are the only two times I hesitated a fraction before clicking, it would be nice to have them in the summary.
Most AI images have issues that I find pretty jarring after having seen a lot. It's a bit like seeing somebody without drafting fundamentals but perfect rendering skills. Currently the only way to really have human level output is to regurgitate something very close to the training data. So I don't think way to make it really hard and "fair" at the same time.