Live data from Hacker News

FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

fcc.gov

171–180 of 242 posts

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#171

While I have no doubt than basically anything from China is probably backdoored (and to the fault of western countries outsourcing manufacturing for cheap labour), what exactly has Huawei done? How do we know that the Cisco equipment also isn't backdoored and if I send a few malformed TCP packets it opens up its control plane on the receiving port? Compared to the last few decades, it seems like a strong hand banning…

Huawei singlehandedly destroyed Canada's Nortel Networks through espionage and sabotage. The CIA did an analysis and discovered that Huawei was dumping wireless equipment to small wireless providers in areas around US military basis at a loss. At the very least, the ability to disrupt communication of those military bases were easily achievable.

I hadn't heard of this before now. I will say though that Nortel had a lot of known issues, including fraudulent scheming by the executives, followed by completely screwing over the pensioners. Nortel leadership was rotten by the time it declared.

https://financialpost.com/news/fp-street/earnings-management...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nortel_Retirees_and_former_emp...

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A rival for hegemony in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. The current hegemon in this region is the US. It is the strongest APAC power by far due to its numerous military bases as well as its network of strong allies (Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea). China seeks to displace the US as the hegemon in APAC. Naturally, the current hegemon doesn't take too kindly to that. So they view China as a rival.

China—so powerful that they believe they can rival the US… but also so weak that they should qualify for WTO protections for developing markets. At a certain point you have to question whether they believe in free trade at all.. or just paying lip service to it to make themselves rich.

I can’t comprehend the confusion of ideas that would lead someone to believe that a communist country believes in free trade.

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#173
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People are taking action now because the West spent decades underestimating China, probably for xenophobic reasons. I'm willing to bet a lot of people assumed they weren't as capable as westerners and now it can't be denied. IMO, it was a classic mistake of underestimating a potential rival while stroking our own egos about how smart, capable and powerful we are in comparison. Reality finally trumped hubris.

It has nothing to do with xenophobia. The Chinese government doesn't play fair, and the West has been letting them get away with it for decades. They take full advantage of open markets available in the rest of the world, but close their markets to outsiders; at best, outsiders can get a piece of the action, but only through the oversight and partial ownership of a local company. The idea that China is still a "devel…

> The Chinese government doesn't play fair

No government or organisation does, and I wouldn’t fault any state for doing it’s best to edge it’s bets.

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nortel networks haven't been around for nearly a decade. I've seen lots of news about 5G/Huaewi and 'core networks' only in the recent years in western countries (UK/US mainly). However, I haven't seen anything published that really reflects new risks/major backdoored products. I wouldn't 100% trust anything built in China, but there must be some reason people are only taking action now? Unless it's just "better late…

People are taking action now because the West spent decades underestimating China, probably for xenophobic reasons. I'm willing to bet a lot of people assumed they weren't as capable as westerners and now it can't be denied. IMO, it was a classic mistake of underestimating a potential rival while stroking our own egos about how smart, capable and powerful we are in comparison. Reality finally trumped hubris.

[dead]

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#176
post #173
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has nothing to do with xenophobia. The Chinese government doesn't play fair, and the West has been letting them get away with it for decades. They take full advantage of open markets available in the rest of the world, but close their markets to outsiders; at best, outsiders can get a piece of the action, but only through the oversight and partial ownership of a local company. The idea that China is still a "devel…

> The Chinese government doesn't play fair No government or organisation does, and I wouldn’t fault any state for doing it’s best to edge it’s bets.

The expression is "hedge its bets" and that doesn't make sense in this context.

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you think Lenovo laptops are back door’s too?

I am typing on one now, but I wouldn't trust them to be used in any national security situation. Unfortunately we are beholden to autocratic countries as we have chosen cheap labour over everything else.

[dead]

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#178
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huawei singlehandedly destroyed Canada's Nortel Networks through espionage and sabotage. The CIA did an analysis and discovered that Huawei was dumping wireless equipment to small wireless providers in areas around US military basis at a loss. At the very least, the ability to disrupt communication of those military bases were easily achievable.

> The CIA did an analysis I had my doubts, but not after the CIA said it's true.

I was going to say whatever the CIA says assume the exact opposite. These guys literally invented the word misinformation.

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's incorrect. You can buy pre-approved modem setups, eg the esp32.

Nope, he is right. If you use that chip you have to get it certified because the traces on the PCB can cause EM interference. Changing the housing of the product can also chance the EM interference so you have to get it recertified before you can sell it. The FCC is a massive regulatory moat against hobbyist electronics. You have to make something expensive enough or with enough scale to make enough profit to be able…

i personally think its a good thing that goods sold commercially are not going to start basking my other electronics in random rf.

Re: FCC Bans Authorizations for Devices That Pose National Security Threat

#180
post #168

While I have no doubt than basically anything from China is probably backdoored (and to the fault of western countries outsourcing manufacturing for cheap labour), what exactly has Huawei done? How do we know that the Cisco equipment also isn't backdoored and if I send a few malformed TCP packets it opens up its control plane on the receiving port? Compared to the last few decades, it seems like a strong hand banning…

A few things to read: https://www.engadget.com/huawei-contractor-pakistan-backdoor... https://www.notebookcheck.net/Huawei-caught-red-handed-The-c... https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-30/vodafone-... Knowing the absolute mess this would cause diplomatically, they still said there was a back door: https://apnews.com/article/a0031b16e3a511e431b1e0a5f20edbf9 https://www.scmagazine.com/news/apt/microsoft-de…

This one is good too: "A U.S. indictment alleges that Huawei and [CFO] Meng participated in a fraudulent scheme to obtain prohibited U.S. goods and technology for Huawei’s Iran-based business, and move money out of Iran by deceiving Western banks."

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-iran-sanctions-exc...

Post reply on HN