41–50 of 144 posts
> The company’s new performance management system could help managers fire thousands of its underperforming employees from early next year
I suppose it could do that, but it could also not do that?
It seems to be based on a report by The Information - no idea whether that had anything more solid.
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
you can agree or disagree if it's honest or justified, but materially that's whats happening.
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
Oh it is totally passive-aggressive coersion. The notion of "poor performers" is a sign of bad management. They bloat the company to where they can no longer get their billion dollar handouts, er, payouts, and then take it out on people who actually care about their jobs and claim they are "poor" at it. While scaring the shit out of everyone else. I know there are going to be a bunch of bros who think, "Yeah, that's…
You realize this article is about Google, right?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
People didn't even stop shopping on Amazon knowing full well how drivers and warehouse employees were treated so...
The driver thing could be regional. I have always lived in a less dense area and the drivers always were happy and helpful. Didn't look at all like what I'd expect from the news.
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
Like every other organization, Google isn’t immune to entropy. It seemed they went into organizational decline faster than the others
It’s incredibly shitty to telegraph to other employers that all the people you’re about to layoff are damaged goods. Completely unnecessary.
Oh it is totally passive-aggressive coersion. The notion of "poor performers" is a sign of bad management. They bloat the company to where they can no longer get their billion dollar handouts, er, payouts, and then take it out on people who actually care about their jobs and claim they are "poor" at it. While scaring the shit out of everyone else. I know there are going to be a bunch of bros who think, "Yeah, that's…
Eh. This article was about Google.