Live data from Hacker News

Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

nature.com

101–110 of 189 posts

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#101
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Things also get interesting if you look at economic and social systems in this context.

Quoted post unavailable.

“ Republicans lead among married men (51%-38%), while married women are evenly divided (44% Republican, 44% Democratic). ” https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-...

That’s out of more than 60 million married couples in the US. Barely here equals about half?

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#103
post #79

"Risky business: linking Toxoplasma gondii infection and entrepreneurship behaviours across individuals and countries" ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30051870/ ) >Among professionals attending entrepreneurship events, T. gondii-positive individuals were 1.8× more likely to have started their own business compared with other attendees (n = 197). Finally, after synthesizing and combining country-level databases on T…

I can see the headlines now "you won't believe this one weird trick for bigger gains and better performance in bed".

What is the legal framework for a product that infects people with "beneficial" parasites ?

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#104

"Risky business: linking Toxoplasma gondii infection and entrepreneurship behaviours across individuals and countries" ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30051870/ ) >Among professionals attending entrepreneurship events, T. gondii-positive individuals were 1.8× more likely to have started their own business compared with other attendees (n = 197). Finally, after synthesizing and combining country-level databases on T…

2 billion people already have the Toxoplasma gondii in their brains. If it were to affect humanity is some profound way, we would have already linked it to something more substantial than n=197 studies of correlating success in entrepreneurship to the virus.

That's a pretty bold take from somebody who thinks it's a virus and not a single-celled parasite. But then as Charles Darwin said, "ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#105
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Cats began their unique relationship with humans 10,000 to 12,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, the geographic region where some of the earliest developments in human civilization occurred ” Correlation or causation?

Surely causation. Farmers store crops which attract rodents which attract felines. Wild cats that mind their manners do better in this environment. Eventually wild cats become the kitty cats we know today.

I think they were suggesting that causality could run the other way.

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#106
I really don't get T. Gondii. I read all these article about how it might be affecting us, a source of mental health disorders, so on and so on. And it is very common in household cats + a lot of people already have it. CDC says, "While the parasite is found throughout the world, more than 40 million people in the United States may be infected with the Toxoplasma parasite." I assume present tense means currently infected?

Genuinely curious, why aren't we doing an annual anti-parasitic or something given the drugs are relatively benign?

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's also the Dunning-Kruger Effect; Incompetent or dumb people don't recognize their own failings and assume they are geniuses. Smart and competent people know their own deficiencies and assume they're limited or dumb.

so if you feel like you are limited/dumb are you actually smart or does realising that loop back to you actually really being dumb. seems like a catch 22

With DK, the underlying model is that people only improve when they see their flaws. People who are very good at seeing their own flaws improve their performance, but tend to think they are doing worse than they are.

In my view whether or not that makes you "smart" or "dumb" depends on what you do with the insight. As Ira Glass writes: "Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through."

Re: Parasite gives wolves what it takes to be pack leaders

#110
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can see the headlines now "you won't believe this one weird trick for bigger gains and better performance in bed".

What is the legal framework for a product that infects people with "beneficial" parasites ?

As long as it doesn’t affect my essential fluids, I’m game
Post reply on HN