Earlier quoted context omitted.
What part of The Economist is "left"? What part of "organized retail crime" is not a "complicated conspiracy theory"? What makes "organized retail crime" a "transparently obvious" explanation?
Pretty sure Marx called upon workers to seize the means of protection to bring forth a new world odor.
Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
31–40 of 763 posts
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment doesn't refute my comment. It's true they removed Sudafed from most (by and large all, except by request) boxes labeled Sudafed (sub-labeling them Sudafed PE), and PE is not effective. Many consumers never realized, and even if they do, they generally do not realize the substitute doesn't really work. Thanks to https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/docs/pseudo-brief112013.pdf in most states you cannot buy it off the…
I agree, my point was only that Sudafed today is not solely phenylephrine.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#33This is why I care. Criminals degrade society and we all suffer for their greed.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#34Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#35The article says prosecutors don't go after these thefts but I'd think the issue is with the cops and the number of arrests. After the BLM protests of 2020 (George Floyd) cops basically went hands off on these so called minor crimes, and so I'd imagine many of them don't even make it to prosecutors. We'd need a graph of incidents and arrests for years prior to 2020 (or months in early vs late 2020) to see the change.
The article claims that the BLM protests made little difference, and include a graph of various states comparing the amount of shoplifting with the amount of prosecution. Generally there doesn’t seem to be a correlation between states with large BLM protests and reduced prosecution. For example, Oregon had huge protests and weak government responses, and yet prosecutes large amounts of shoplifting. Blaming this on th…
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#36Same in SF, I assumed it was because of the homelessness problem. Seems more likely than shoplifting gangs..
The homeless population (including those in shelters and cars) is < 1% of SF's population. Even if they used products at the same rate as the rest of the population and stole 100% of what they used, they would be responsible for less than half of retail shrinkage.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#37Manhattan is getting the law enforcement it demanded.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#38> "The stores are insured bro, why do you care if people steal from them? It's not your problem maaan." This is why I care. Criminals degrade society and we all suffer for their greed.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#39> "The stores are insured bro, why do you care if people steal from them? It's not your problem maaan." This is why I care. Criminals degrade society and we all suffer for their greed.
Re: Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan
#40The article says prosecutors don't go after these thefts but I'd think the issue is with the cops and the number of arrests. After the BLM protests of 2020 (George Floyd) cops basically went hands off on these so called minor crimes, and so I'd imagine many of them don't even make it to prosecutors. We'd need a graph of incidents and arrests for years prior to 2020 (or months in early vs late 2020) to see the change.
The article claims that the BLM protests made little difference, and include a graph of various states comparing the amount of shoplifting with the amount of prosecution. Generally there doesn’t seem to be a correlation between states with large BLM protests and reduced prosecution. For example, Oregon had huge protests and weak government responses, and yet prosecutes large amounts of shoplifting. Blaming this on th…