Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
41–50 of 225 posts
Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#42Maybe I lack imagination, but it seems like if you have enough control over a situation that you can deploy a police robot instead of charging in, then you have enough control to make non-lethal force a viable option.
Bystanders. You can't bet someone elses life based on how well a taser may or may not work. LTL is a real dice throw.
Also vulnerable to bullets, as it turns out.
Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#43Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#44Maybe I lack imagination, but it seems like if you have enough control over a situation that you can deploy a police robot instead of charging in, then you have enough control to make non-lethal force a viable option.
Bystanders. You can't bet someone elses life based on how well a taser may or may not work. LTL is a real dice throw.
How does a lethal robot mitigate bystander risk compared to a policy officer using lethal force?
Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cops in america already shoot way too many people. Do you think giving them the ability to do that from a remote location is going to help?
I'm not pro gun or even American, but to me it seems a lot of those shootings happen in high stress situations, not in a remotely controlled environment.
The main issue to my understanding is that you can't trust police reports as they have no incentive to write their motives plainly, and no peer pressure to expose bad reporting.
Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you think sending in humans is the better option? - REPLYING TO BELOW - > Why does anyone or anything need to “go in”? There are plenty of other ways to deal with these situations instead of pretending to be Seal Team Six. Such as? Like a large magnet to pull the guns out of their hand? Sometimes these situations will only result in shootouts, like busting a drug operation of a gang. Then you have to go in to prot…
There's always not "fighting fire with fire" Working on having less guns would be a start. In terms of "less lethal" pepper spray is usually pretty good
It's disorienting but you can still be a very lethal threat under it's effects.
That also assumes the pepper spray works, it's not too windy, you can get within 15ft, suspect isn't running...
Re: Draft policy proposal would authorize SF Police to use deadly force with robots
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you think sending in humans is the better option? - REPLYING TO BELOW - > Why does anyone or anything need to “go in”? There are plenty of other ways to deal with these situations instead of pretending to be Seal Team Six. Such as? Like a large magnet to pull the guns out of their hand? Sometimes these situations will only result in shootouts, like busting a drug operation of a gang. Then you have to go in to prot…
Why does anyone or anything need to “go in”? There are plenty of other ways to deal with these situations instead of pretending to be Seal Team Six.