Live data from Hacker News

271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

thisiscolossal.com

31–40 of 41 posts

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#31
post #4

What a treasure! I particularly like one thing about the picture of the butterfly. Look up what’s wrong with nearly every modern depiction of butterflies if you dare…

Google gave me nothing

Try "emilydamstra butterfly". I'm being serious, once you know, it's extreme "cannot unsee" territory.

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#32
post #23
post #8

Interestingly, neither the web page nor the previous threads address that the colors in the book might have changed/faded over the centuries, depending on the dyes used. The pages probably didn’t get significant light exposure, but heat and chemical factors might have had an impact. And, of course, the photos might not be completely color-accurate.

> heat and chemical factors might have had an impact Pretty much guaranteed by the fact the pages are yellow, presumably paper acidity? When I wrote my thesis, it was supposed to be on acid-free paper and archival, but I snuck in some color printed pictures, and boy did that not work out so well. 20 years later and the pages are yellow and the colors are fading. > the photos might not be completely color-accurate It’…

> The best way to reproduce the colors might be to follow Boogert’s recipes for the paint, which I think is what he documented?

That's back far enough that following the recipes is bound to be _hard_.

Chemicals and pigments and such go by different names, are produced in different processes and formulations, and some are extremely hard to get due to someone noticing that it rots your genes or whatever.

Maybe whatever pigments are used in watercolors aren't affected by this much, but I bet at least some are.

It'd should be fun to try though, for a certain kind of person.

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't need a license to use any color in Photoshop. You need a license for a collection of stand-in mappings for spot colors, the vast majority of which can't be convincingly represented on a monitor. You can ignore Pantone entirely, put in whatever color you want, and nobody will know or complain. You can even use any color you want in Photoshop, then make a plate out of it for the press, and tell people the Pan…

There is a useful service Pantone is providing: when I want a physical thing to be a certain color, I can buy that color ink from them to get it consistently. But once I've applied the ink to the thing in question, it's mine like that forever. Imagine that Pantone demanded all of their customers to pay them protection money every month, or they'd send their goons to spray-paint black over everything you ever used the…

[deleted]

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#34
post #8

Interestingly, neither the web page nor the previous threads address that the colors in the book might have changed/faded over the centuries, depending on the dyes used. The pages probably didn’t get significant light exposure, but heat and chemical factors might have had an impact. And, of course, the photos might not be completely color-accurate.

maybe that question of pigment persistence is interesting but just not relevant in discussing the book?

maybe the interesting aspect is the perseverance of the author and their systematic and thorough approach and their desire to create a complete work over all watercolor pigments?

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#35
post #32
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> heat and chemical factors might have had an impact Pretty much guaranteed by the fact the pages are yellow, presumably paper acidity? When I wrote my thesis, it was supposed to be on acid-free paper and archival, but I snuck in some color printed pictures, and boy did that not work out so well. 20 years later and the pages are yellow and the colors are fading. > the photos might not be completely color-accurate It’…

> The best way to reproduce the colors might be to follow Boogert’s recipes for the paint, which I think is what he documented? That's back far enough that following the recipes is bound to be _hard_. Chemicals and pigments and such go by different names, are produced in different processes and formulations, and some are extremely hard to get due to someone noticing that it rots your genes or whatever. Maybe whatever…

There are some pigments we wouldn't use anymore like ground up mummies for yellow.

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#36
post #8

Interestingly, neither the web page nor the previous threads address that the colors in the book might have changed/faded over the centuries, depending on the dyes used. The pages probably didn’t get significant light exposure, but heat and chemical factors might have had an impact. And, of course, the photos might not be completely color-accurate.

To me this is the weirdest thing about Pantone the company, their products etc: so much trouble to try to make sure that for a fleeting moment some knick-knack produced half a world away looks like it did on the designer’s expensive monitor. Then, time happens.

Is the world better off than if we just eyeballed it?

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So basically, they want some money to map RGB values to a set of numbers, each of which enumerates the output of a ridiculously challenging chemistry project?

> they want some money to map RGB values to a set of numbers Sorry to reiterate this in another thread, but what they want is some money to map the output of a ridiculously challenging chemistry project to some RGB values that will give a vaguely similar impression.

Hmm, or the ridiculously challenging chemistry products could have spec sheets with spectra? Then other folks could work maps.

Though that would be failing to leverage dominant market position to extract maximum value. Leaving aside the "nice years of images you'all have there... it would be a shame if..." aspect of current events. To be fair, it's not like some (Si not color) chip makers with dominant position aren't "here's the spec... and if you want to actually use the chip, without massive reverse engineering, ask sales about your support and partnership options". And I suppose there's also "surprise, v2 is discontinued - to adapt your work to v3, contact sales".

I'm exploring emphasizing spectra in K-2 color content, to help disentangle the usual incoherent blur of material properties, physical light, and physiologic color. So I've wondered the last few days if Pantone somehow prevents scanning a chip set and posting spectra. As it might also permit "New Dryadtone(tm pending) Adobe palette to the rescue, now for only $5/mo! With our wonderful Palette Pricing Stability Guarantee!"

Re: 271 years before Pantone, every color imaginable in an 800-page book

#39
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The best way to reproduce the colors might be to follow Boogert’s recipes for the paint, which I think is what he documented? That's back far enough that following the recipes is bound to be _hard_. Chemicals and pigments and such go by different names, are produced in different processes and formulations, and some are extremely hard to get due to someone noticing that it rots your genes or whatever. Maybe whatever…

There are some pigments we wouldn't use anymore like ground up mummies for yellow.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_brown

What a strange world.

Post reply on HN