Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Rent-seeking" is blatantly false. Warp is a piece of software that the developers are going to update over time. A subscription model is appropriate for goods and services where the buyers receive value over time due to the continued effort/resources of the producers. You might not want to subscribe to a service or pay for a terminal emulator (I sure don't), but don't lie about it. "Rent seeking [...] is an economic…
A subscription model seems appropriate when the value accrues to the buyer over time without regard to the level of effort expended by the seller. As a buyer, I care about my cost and the value I receive. I don’t demand to see proof of costs incurred or effort expended on the part of the seller to understand whether I got value in excess of my cost. When I pay my house insurance or mortgage, I don’t ask the insurer o…
That's a personal opinion, which I disagree with, and is additionally economically unsustainable. But you're free to have that opinion - the problem is sli actively misleading others by using a term like "rent-seeking" with a specific definition where it is categorically incorrect.