Live data from Hacker News

Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

news.ycombinator.com

121–130 of 145 posts

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#121

I voted "no" but honestly it depends entirely on the job market. It's amazing how low your standards go when you're jobless and have a family to feed. Back in 2008 I took a job with a founder I'd describe as a Mini-Elon and it really sucked, but what sucks more is living in your car.

This tells me you live in the US!

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#122
post #119
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, well, speak of gaslighting. The twitter employees have been hostile to him since before him buying this dumpster fire was ever a rumor. People are almost exclusively talking about his politics. Unless I report to him directly his management style is hardly my problem. Even if it is directly, well.. honestly don't find that stressful either. If he is being a stupid idiot I'd tell him just that, have in the past.…

> If management is not living in reality part of the gig is to push back That's exactly what is happening

Do you currently work there or are you part of the peanut gallery?

And please, I beg you, don't give me a tirade about politics or offensive tweets. I am not interested.

If Elon has wrong notions about spambots, checkmarks, which datastore to use, project deadline estimations - great, sounds like every company ever. He probably does, so what. And if I put you in charge you probably will drift away from reality in short order.

All you can do is push back and say stuff like: 'actually it will take x7 your estimates because of these concrete reasons' or 'that spam algo won't fix it because you haven't considered x,y,z here is statistical proof'.

Otherwise nucleus will get behind schedule: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddTbNKWw7Zs

If nobody believes you or listens, well you are on the record. Who cares. Maybe you get fired maybe you get promoted.

Twitter has been languishing anyway there is really nothing to lose by giving it a proper go. Sounds like fun to me actually.

All the whiners seem to be able to talk about is everything except, you know, the actual work.

Honestly the whiners can just bail already, quit the company and the website. Go to Mastodon and stop caring. Life is short.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are the same thing. His management style involves publicly berating his employees over twitter, insulting his own company, and firing on a whim. Nah, I'll pass. There are so many better run companies out there, I'm here to work not babysit the CEO.

Whom is babysitting whom? You're unlikely to ever meet the CEO, he is unlikely to know who you are. > Nah, I'll pass. There are so many better run companies out there Than Twitter? No kidding! Well, pass. Just say that. I still don't get why you care what he (or anyone) tweets, but hey, horses for courses. Personally I have accepted chaos into my heart. It seems to follow no matter where I go. So long as the cheques…

Yes, babysit the CEO. He clearly can't handle critical feedback, which means everyone has to bend over backwards to avoid hurting his feelings. That has impacts all the way down the chain. Who wants to work for such a fragile leader?

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#124
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if freedom of discourse was more important than spaceships or electric cars or solar panels? I think it is. My guess is Elon does too.

Elon has completely failed to communicate what he means by "freedom of discourse". Judged by his actions so far it seems like it means "mostly the same as Twitter's existing policies, but you can't impersonate people and you especially can't impersonate Elon". Which seems like it's less freedom than before(?) It honestly seems like he hasn't thought about the problem deeply enough to have a coherent vision here. We'l…

I’m glad he’s giving it a shot. No idea if it will work, but I am quite sure that progress as a species is dependent on a culture of open conjecture and criticism. Old Twitter was trending the other way imo, esp when it came to working with the government to decide what was true or not.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I value money a lot more than I did two decades ago. Two decades ago I was a young, “fight the system”, James Dean want-to-be. Now I have a family, mortgage, and the kids need braces. And my water heater is making weird sounds.

I don't think any of that justifies anything except in thevery short term. You gotta do what you gotta do sometimes, but not for life. Your family would rather have their dad than their dads paycheck. It doesn't require 120hours of hell at work just to secure food and shelter. Why do I care? Everyone who is willing to abase themselves and suffer abuse makes the world suck more for everyone else who would demand a lit…

I was responding to a post about being willing to work for Elon Musk … not work 120 hours a week or abase myself.

For example, if I found myself being pushed into “voluntary” meditation sessions where I chant “I am not me but, We™” I’d be out of there fast.

Or if my boss wanted me to do something horribly unethical like provide fine grained tracking data for users.

But AFAIK Tesla, SpaceX, Boring Company, etc. are pretty typical in regards to work life balance, pay, etc.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whom is babysitting whom? You're unlikely to ever meet the CEO, he is unlikely to know who you are. > Nah, I'll pass. There are so many better run companies out there Than Twitter? No kidding! Well, pass. Just say that. I still don't get why you care what he (or anyone) tweets, but hey, horses for courses. Personally I have accepted chaos into my heart. It seems to follow no matter where I go. So long as the cheques…

Yes, babysit the CEO. He clearly can't handle critical feedback, which means everyone has to bend over backwards to avoid hurting his feelings. That has impacts all the way down the chain. Who wants to work for such a fragile leader?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqtb6XBBBRc

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#127

Today, no way. Maybe 2 decades ago when I was a teenager and valued money way more. But regardless of his business outcomes, I'm not going to ever work for a manchild throwing public tantrums, who can't be criticised for valid reasons. His decision making process of throwing stuff and seeing what sticks is also something I don't want to deal with every day at work. Life's too short to be a dictator's puppet.

I value money a lot more than I did two decades ago. Two decades ago I was a young, “fight the system”, James Dean want-to-be. Now I have a family, mortgage, and the kids need braces. And my water heater is making weird sounds.

Yeah, but there are other places that pay decently. I've got 2 decades of experience now, and get paid enough in a good place. I know where I could get paid more, but even with a family, we don't need more. I even reduced my work to 4 days a week with the 20% hit and it's still enough.

For software engineers this is often simple to achieve.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Elon has completely failed to communicate what he means by "freedom of discourse". Judged by his actions so far it seems like it means "mostly the same as Twitter's existing policies, but you can't impersonate people and you especially can't impersonate Elon". Which seems like it's less freedom than before(?) It honestly seems like he hasn't thought about the problem deeply enough to have a coherent vision here. We'l…

I’m glad he’s giving it a shot. No idea if it will work, but I am quite sure that progress as a species is dependent on a culture of open conjecture and criticism. Old Twitter was trending the other way imo, esp when it came to working with the government to decide what was true or not.

The problem is that social media as presently designed faces a choice between being an absolute cess pit of trolls and hate or being sometimes over-moderated. There is no way to do moderation right that will not get you accused of being biased or operating in bad faith by a large faction of people.

If Elon can solve that he truly is a genius. So far no Internet forum has managed to achieve anything but that trade-off.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#129

Today: hard no When I was in my thirties: possibly When I was in my twenties: hard yes (I've since read some other comments and money is not the issue; the chance to work on something possibly world changing [Musk's Application X] is the issue).

5-10 years ago I would have said yes to either SpaceX or Tesla, if my skills were aligned with what they were working on. I was younger, and the chance to change the world would have justified the lower pay.

But working at Twitter isn’t a chance to change the world. It’s a chance to do the same stuff I’ve done I’ve done a million times before, but with worse pay, worse culture, and an asshole CEO.

Re: Poll: Would You Work for Elon?

#130
Yes. I also feel that a lot of people may be misunderstanding the motivation here. I think Musk is saying what he’s saying for a very specific simple reason. To weed out people who are just cruising along and being paid not doing much. I doubt he’ll continue pushing this narrative that much when he gets the desired result, getting back to a more reasonable typical startup execution mode.

And I never was a fanboy, I just worked myself at Meta for almost 4 years and this is literally what I would do if (god forbid lol) I’d be given a chance to take over as a CEO. Let go of 50-70% of slackers or just people doing random shit and shut down some ridiculous orgs. Make sure everybody understands the culture changed. And then proceed in a more normal fashion.

If you haven’t been at Meta/Goog, it’s really hard to believe how bad is it there. There’re even memes like “rest and vest”. In a normal starup, people like that would be goners very quickly. In these large bloated money-corrupted orgs with no critical oversight on many layers you can survive literally for years doing literally close to nothing if you built a good enough initial rep.

Not saying all the engineers/folks he fired are like that, of course. But I’m pretty sure a lot are. And having worked in the company for many years is actually a negative signal here from that perspective. Because old-timers may have a lot of internal cred not necessarily based on their most recent accomplishments.

Edit: typos

Post reply on HN