Live data from Hacker News

SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

sourcehut.org

181–190 of 279 posts

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#181

A lot of the comments so far have been negative, so I’ll add a positive one: I think this was the right move, and I’m content (as an actual paying member) with it. Kudos particularly for the well-laid-out position statement. Drew and I have extensive differences in opinion when it comes to software, but his sincerity and willingness to put his money where his mouth is are apparent in cases like this.

You can cheer for your ideology, but what if your business was the one being purged because the owners profess to be the moral guardians of humanity?

"... but what if your business was the one being purged because the owners profess to be the moral guardians of humanity?"

I'm sympathetic to your objection but I note with interest that their announcement included this paragraph:

"We will exercise discretion when applying this rule. If you believe that your use-case for cryptocurrency or blockchain is not plagued by these social problems, you may ask for permission to host it on SourceHut, or appeal its removal ..."

... which is a catch-all that covers edge cases that I might be worried about.

It's not scalable, but sr.ht isn't that big so it works for me.

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#182
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a political statement. I don’t think declaring “inaction is political” makes it so. Sounds like sloganeering.

Inaction is a political position in support of the status quo. It is the equivalent of saying "I am fine with this".

There are billions of political issues on Earth. Do you think if someone isn't protesting against water spoilage in some random village on the opposite side of the planst, then they support it?

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, those are clearly cryptocurrency-related projects which fall well within the scope of this policy. The exceptions are not to let the "good" cryptocurrency projects in -- there are no such projects -- but to make sure that projects which are close to this domain get a fair shake, like something which incidentally uses a blockchain-like data structure, GNU Taler, etc.

Seems like you are saying that anything primarily relying on a permissionless and distributed consensus mechanism will not get a pass.

That's not what I am saying at all. Please read the article, it's very specific on what kind of activity is prohibited.

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Inaction is a political position in support of the status quo. It is the equivalent of saying "I am fine with this".

I disagree with this. Inaction is merely an acknowledgement that we can't be informed, effective activists on everything. I'm pretty much disengaged from political activism these days, because I don't want to be manipulated into joining the human equivalent of a botnet. Instead I focus on the one area (accessibility for disabled people) where I'm actually knowledgeable enough to have an informed opinion, and where I…

adding to that it is difficult to engage in political activism without getting into partisan politics which is undesirable to some.

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#186
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Inaction is a political position in support of the status quo. It is the equivalent of saying "I am fine with this".

There are billions of political issues on Earth. Do you think if someone isn't protesting against water spoilage in some random village on the opposite side of the planst, then they support it?

To clarify, I would narrow my statement, perhaps, to something like this: "inaction [regarding a subject with which you are familiar and are in a position to act on] is a political position".

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#189

Lot of throwaway accounts at the top of this thread, that's quite funny fun, and telling about this site Cryptocurrencies are ponzi schemes, they are scams, they should be illegal There are better ways to fight the current system than with other scams

Who is running the Bitcoin ponzi? The CEO of Bitcoin? Any other type of computing/calculation you'd like to make illegal? Maybe everything that gets hashed with SHA-256 should be preapproved by the government first?

bitcoin is a CIA/FED project to crowdfund the development and harden the security of the tech, to prepare for the digital EURODOLLAR

there is nothing illegal there, you play with the words, you know excatly what i'm talking about

"whitepaper: by investing in GreenCoin you help save lifes in africa by helping us plant trees"

coinbase, binance and every other exchanges facilitates these ponzi schemes

since institutions are playing blind, how do you fix the issue?

it's similar with Twitter and conspiracy theorists, are you against free speech? shouldn't we ban them and delete their tweets?

it's the same here, you don't give them a place to prosper

bonus:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31012462

oh i remember that account :'D

Re: SourceHut terms of service updates, cryptocurrency projects to be removed

#190

A lot of the comments so far have been negative, so I’ll add a positive one: I think this was the right move, and I’m content (as an actual paying member) with it. Kudos particularly for the well-laid-out position statement. Drew and I have extensive differences in opinion when it comes to software, but his sincerity and willingness to put his money where his mouth is are apparent in cases like this.

You can cheer for your ideology, but what if your business was the one being purged because the owners profess to be the moral guardians of humanity?

Do you know literally anyone who is running a business that is reliant on sr.ht and cannot be moved? sourcehut is small, and they go out of their way to help you migrate data away from their service. If this kills you, move to github and digitalocean like a normal person.
Post reply on HN