Earlier quoted context omitted.
The round knob to increase / decrease sound volume is simply the best UX in the car. Why do I have to navigate to a submenu to push a button repeatedly to change the volume. The less I look at the road the higher the risk of an accident.
The whisker controls are even better. No need to take hands off the wheel.
Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
181–190 of 392 posts
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#182Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#183I understand that this is a rant about a niche feature but you know what we really should stop doing right now? We should stop producing giant piles of metal with four weels weighting more than 2 or 3 tons. No matter what stupid options they have, SUVs and big cars and trucks are a total nonsense. Sadly they are slowly becoming the norm. We should keep our vehicles under a ton so that we stop wasting so much of our p…
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#184GM also has electronic primary door release mechanisms in their vehicles. So if the car has no power, you can’t open the doors from inside. Granted, because of regulatory requirements there is STILL A MANUAL RELEASE… on the floor, near the chassis sill (and might be driver-seat only). So you save money going to electronic releases, but still have to put a manual one in anyways. The glovebox is merely annoying (though…
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was in a car crash as a child. Two cars caught fire, although I didn't realise it until I got out. My door was blocked by another vehicle, as was my dad's. He was busy trying to get my sister to open her front passenger door, so he could clamber out after her. The other rear door was damaged, and I had to pull the latch and then kick it to open it. (Not sure how that would work with one of these small manual releas…
How does this work in a plain-old car with child locks set on the rear doors? My children had opened the doors while the car was moving at least once before I had to use the child locks; now, as far as I can tell, nobody is getting out of the back doors unless they're opened from the outside.
(I was 11.)
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may sound strange but UX is main reason why I drive mazda. I have no other requirements (besides basic safety).
Driver UX was the reason of my initial focus on BMW over other makers.
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#187I'm not looking forward to buying another car, since I've been hearing of a lot of criminally negligent human factors engineering for at least a decade, combined with increasingly invasive spying on people in their own cars. Is there any decent automotive company remaining?
Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#188Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches
#189People raise their blood pressure for nothing. You could have both a touch screen glove box release and a discreet manual release for emergencies. It’s just for aesthetics.
Anyway, you don't have "a discreet manual release" on actual implementation of that crap, so yeah that's the point: you could and you should have a manual release. At which point the touchscreen insanity for that would not make sense and would disappear.