Live data from Hacker News

Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

theautopian.com

181–190 of 392 posts

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The round knob to increase / decrease sound volume is simply the best UX in the car. Why do I have to navigate to a submenu to push a button repeatedly to change the volume. The less I look at the road the higher the risk of an accident.

The whisker controls are even better. No need to take hands off the wheel.

Not sure if you're native (disclaimer: I'm certainly not) but I believe the word is (steering wheel) stalk.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#182
I understand that this is a rant about a niche feature but you know what we really should stop doing right now? We should stop producing giant piles of metal with four weels weighting more than 2 or 3 tons. No matter what stupid options they have, SUVs and big cars and trucks are a total nonsense. Sadly they are slowly becoming the norm. We should keep our vehicles under a ton so that we stop wasting so much of our precious energy moving these f-ing tanks on the road. Roads that we pay for and that are decaying faster and faster the more we keep buying them. Not to mention car accidents involving those monstrosities...

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#183

I understand that this is a rant about a niche feature but you know what we really should stop doing right now? We should stop producing giant piles of metal with four weels weighting more than 2 or 3 tons. No matter what stupid options they have, SUVs and big cars and trucks are a total nonsense. Sadly they are slowly becoming the norm. We should keep our vehicles under a ton so that we stop wasting so much of our p…

Sure. You're right, but I don't see how that's a relevant comment for this article.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#184
post #89

GM also has electronic primary door release mechanisms in their vehicles. So if the car has no power, you can’t open the doors from inside. Granted, because of regulatory requirements there is STILL A MANUAL RELEASE… on the floor, near the chassis sill (and might be driver-seat only). So you save money going to electronic releases, but still have to put a manual one in anyways. The glovebox is merely annoying (though…

The glove box is where I keep my safety hammer.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was in a car crash as a child. Two cars caught fire, although I didn't realise it until I got out. My door was blocked by another vehicle, as was my dad's. He was busy trying to get my sister to open her front passenger door, so he could clamber out after her. The other rear door was damaged, and I had to pull the latch and then kick it to open it. (Not sure how that would work with one of these small manual releas…

How does this work in a plain-old car with child locks set on the rear doors? My children had opened the doors while the car was moving at least once before I had to use the child locks; now, as far as I can tell, nobody is getting out of the back doors unless they're opened from the outside.

Uninjured children can probably climb through to the front and use those doors, even if the driver is injured. I would think a 5 year old should manage that? But they would be familiar with how the doors normally open, and probably not an emergency release handle.

(I was 11.)

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#186
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It may sound strange but UX is main reason why I drive mazda. I have no other requirements (besides basic safety).

Driver UX was the reason of my initial focus on BMW over other makers.

BMW is not bad (I own one) but try turning off the air conditioner some time.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#187
post #72

I'm not looking forward to buying another car, since I've been hearing of a lot of criminally negligent human factors engineering for at least a decade, combined with increasingly invasive spying on people in their own cars. Is there any decent automotive company remaining?

No hope unfortunatelly, car-as-subscription is the dream of automakers and they will do everything to reach the goal. Adding various gimmicks and as many electronic failure points as possible is to make device less reliable and obsolete in a couple of years so new one needs to be bought.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#188
At first I thought this is about some extra functionality, like having an additional way of opening the glove box, or perhaps even locking it. I thought it's harmless, since that action wouldn't be performed too often. I never thought this would be about actually replacing the physical latch.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#189
post #34

People raise their blood pressure for nothing. You could have both a touch screen glove box release and a discreet manual release for emergencies. It’s just for aesthetics.

If it was just for aesthetics, you could have just a discreet manual release.

Anyway, you don't have "a discreet manual release" on actual implementation of that crap, so yeah that's the point: you could and you should have a manual release. At which point the touchscreen insanity for that would not make sense and would disappear.

Re: Nobody wants touch-screen glove box latches

#190
Humans are just apes looking for the newest color of banana. We already know a lot about human machine interfaces and safety and human attention, and yet we throw that all away to offer and get the new shiny toy that merely changed something and usually for the worse. The older you get, the more you realize why older people are so cranky about certain things. As you gain age and experience, you become aware of the reality that humans simply will not change for the better in the collective, and that we remain driven by emotional needs rather than the reason we pride ourselves on.
Post reply on HN