Earlier quoted context omitted.
What sources?
Source: Elon Musk https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1586073042534297601
“Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
311–320 of 1001 posts
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#312[0] https://www.facebook.com/journalismproject/facebook-oversigh...
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many of the “unbanned” accounts weren’t banned before and that didn’t change. They were in Twitter jail (or whatever the term is). The account is there but they couldn’t publish new tweets. That’s the change to watch for. He could unban Trump, say he kept his promise, but keep the account locked so that Trump couldn’t actually tweet. As a hypothetical example.
It's called a temporary suspension. Twitter asks you to acknowledge your tweet was bad by deleting it yourself. If you do, you get a time-out in the naughty corner for 12 hours, or a week, or whatever, and then you can tweet again. If you don't, you stay in the naughty corner. Whoever designed this process could stand to learn how to treat people like adults, in my opinion.
So, simply shadow ban them, then?
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
A bunch of accounts like The Babylon Bee and Ye have been unbanned w/o input from any such committee of diverse viewpoints. I don't have much faith that Musk will not act unilaterally in service of his friends and allies.
Babylon Bee being suspended was one of the dumber things the previous Twitter rules had done. It's a satire site, it's right leaning, nothing in the piece they said was hateful or even an unpopular view. Kanye's ban, he's just a mentally ill person. I don't think he meant "death con" he just didn't know that it's actually "def con." His remarks are still reprehensible. Twitter's whole moderation problem has been it i…
Why?
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is still animus between musk and certain groups of thought. Certain people always see the negative and worst case scenario. Others see opportunities with various levels of risk aversion. Clearly Musk is in the latter camp. I said earlier that twitter has been hemorrhaging money to tune of nearly 2 billion over the last 2.5 years. While possible, its likely that Musk can't possibly do worse than the former leade…
> Clearly Musk is in the latter camp. Is he actually thought? If so, why did he try to maneuver out of the deal right up until it was clear he would not be able to?
I don't see the causal connection people are drawing between this and his motivations and his vision for twitter, it's purely a financial logical decision to try to renegotiate or cancel the deal given the current market conditions.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
A bunch of accounts like The Babylon Bee and Ye have been unbanned w/o input from any such committee of diverse viewpoints. I don't have much faith that Musk will not act unilaterally in service of his friends and allies.
I think one reasonable policy could be "form a council of diverse viewpoints and only ban someone if they all (or mostly all) agree the person should be kicked off" and another reasonable policy could be "form a council fo diverse viewpoints and ban someone if one (or a couple) think the person should be kicked off. I think its fair to say the committee will end up being a scapegoat - but to be charitable to the idea…
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#317It’s amazing to me that the HN hive mind has decided that somehow one of the most successful people on the planet, who’s built a successful electric car company, a private rocketry company and was part of the people who laid foundation for a “payment system for the internet” is somehow doomed to fail in his new venture. The excitement for this new move seems not just low here but overwhelmingly negative. “It can’t be…
i've said it before, there's much easier money to be made than better against Musk. When presenting a big idea he's pretty much been laughed out of every room he's ever walked into. Then, much to everyone's dismay, he does it. I'm withholding judgment for a few years...
On the other hand, with that amount of wealth, the average intelligent person probably feels that they could do better, and I'm not sure they'd be completely wrong.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#318Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the most ignorant thing I have read in awhile. Adversity is adversity, white males face it, women face it, PoC face it. What you don't think there are white kids with single moms? Or white kids that had dads that beat them? Or white kids that were molested? Or white kids that got harassed by police? Or white kids that were told to give up, or that they wouldn't amount to anything? Your view of white people is…
Interesting. I imagine that means you're a real champion of improving opportunities for minorities, and spend a substantial amount of your time taking action to try and solve that problem, since adversity is adversity.