Live data from Hacker News

The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

twitter.com

81–90 of 505 posts

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#81
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Elon doesn't actually believe in a free marketplace of ideas, Is he banning left wing accounts? Is there any evidence of what you say?

Will he unban ISIS recruiting accounts? Will he unban Trump? Alex Jones? He's not a free speech absolutist, he's just making room for his personal ideology. He doesn't need to ban leftists to achieve his goal of pushing them off the platform.

> Will he unban ISIS recruiting accounts?

Pretty extreme example but pretty sure aiding terrorists runs afoul of some US laws...

> He doesn't need to ban leftists to achieve his goal of pushing them off the platform.

Seems like they're the ones who don't believe in free speech. They can stay, no?

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#82
post #55
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't offensive, and no (reasonable) people are claiming it is. What's not appropriate, is referring to the person that exists today, as Ellen Page.

She’s the same person!

Same ghost, different machine. Their identity is now Eliot. Probably wouldn't even be an issue to call them Ellen if we lived in a world where people weren't deliberate with their mis-identification to troll trans people, but here we are.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#83

[flagged]

The problem for Musk is that Twitter never banned them for being right-wing. They were banned for undeniable, crystal-clear breaches of their terms of service. Is Musk going to allow child porn, inciteful content, doxxing ? This is an unwindable situation.

If you can't tell the difference between making fun of a public figure and child pornography, you should take a step back.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#84
post #46

[flagged]

> Elon doesn't actually believe in a free marketplace of ideas, Is he banning left wing accounts? Is there any evidence of what you say?

Evidence, that basic thing that is always absent from assertions like the one above.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#85
post #35

I imagine this will do a speed run of unbanning -> turning into a cesspit of toxicity because ‘free speech’ -> lots of people leave because it’s so unpleasant. It’ll be fun to watch though, as someone that’s never valued the site.

I think you're correct. The example of the Heat Death of Usenet seems relevant. If you don't trim spam and annoyances, people leave. I think Musk's Twitter will be an interesting test, if Musk allows enough unfettered speech.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#87

Great, they should have never been banned to begin with.

They were never banned only suspended, and there's nothing in the link to indicate that they've been un-suspended from posting.

From last week proof that they weren't banned: https://web.archive.org/web/20221019005155/https://twitter.c...

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#88
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They selected Rachel Levine as their pick for "Man of the Year", although she is a transgender woman. Babylon Bee says that she is a man, and the truth cannot be hate speech. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Levine Honestly I would agree with Babylon Bee if it would be just for satire, like giving a funny award to a transgender woman, I get it, but they are not in it for the jokes, they are in it for the truth as…

Surely the truth can be hate speech. For example, a statement like “I hate X and I call on my followers to organize and commit against X” would surely be hate speech even if it’s true.

One is a statement of fact. Another is an opinion with a call to action.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#89
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Quoted post unavailable.

> Why is it offensive to say that my celebrity crush used to be Ellen Page (until she came out as lesbian)?

It isn't.

Talking about someone's dead name is not offensive.

Referring to someone using their deadname today is. For example, saying "Ellen Page was really good in the latest season of The Umbrella Academy" is offensive because at that point, they were identifying as Elliot.

In the case of someone not being notable before a transition, talk of their deadname is offensive because it is clearly being done in bad faith. If they were transitioned before they became a notable person, why the obsession with knowing their deadname? There's really only one reason: Because you want to call them that as an "own" against transgender people.

Re: The Babylon Bee's Twitter account is no longer suspended

#90

Great, they should have never been banned to begin with.

It's very easy to say this at a high level. But once you look into the reasons behind every ban you will see the subtleties that surround this discussion. There is a reason that content moderation has been classed as the world's toughest problem.

It is indeed. But my experience from what I saw from Twitter was a clear bias towards certain... authoritarian ticks? u know. It is a private company anyway, just mentioning the had those. They could do whatever.

Just an observation :)

I hope it is more balanced from now on. Now is when we will be able to see if Elon delivers on his words.

We will see how it goes.

Post reply on HN