Not sure about Sweden, but I got data removed from very many such websites via objection to processing of my data (https://gdpr-info.eu/art-21-gdpr/) (instead of request for removal). If the company doesn't find some strong legal basis that would override my objection, they have to remove the data. "Interest of society" doesn't cut it[1], since that's satisfied by the data being publicly available from official sources in the most uptodate and non-confusing manner. (that source is just not indexed in search engines) So there's that. So now if someone searches my name, they'll find my contributions to linux kernel, and other sensible things, instead of 3 pages of these garbage SEO spamming nonsense cloned from public registers.
They'd really have to push it to find legal basis for overriding objection to listing random, often outdated and misleading info on their SEO spaming websites and misdirecting public from official sources. Usually they just remove the info. If they resist, I just point them to my local's DPA cases where similar companies were fined for the same thing. Easy. :)
[1] The whole point of that article is to override art. 6 1e/1f provisions for public interest in some cases.