Live data from Hacker News

New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

thedrive.com

151–160 of 175 posts

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#151
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rather than simply saying No tell them to put you on their do not call list. Saying that is useless in many situations, but for a company like XM Radio that you haven’t done business with they really need to follow those rules.

Some companies have notoriously desperate pesterering. I've opted out of XM Radio and Spectrum solicitation multiple times. It doesn't seem to stick.

As i posted above, if you are in Canada you can file a complaint with the government. This is how i finally got them to stop.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#152
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some companies have notoriously desperate pesterering. I've opted out of XM Radio and Spectrum solicitation multiple times. It doesn't seem to stick.

You must explicitly use the words “Put me on your do not call list.” It’s dumb, but “If you want a telemarketer to stop calling you, do not say “Quit calling me” or “Don’t call me again.” In some companies, Reps are informed under strict guidelines to only delete records if the customer specifically requests they do so. Telemarketers are only required to put you on the “Do Not Call” list if you SPECIFICALLY request t…

Again, depends on the country and the laws of that nation.

I'm Canadian: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/telemarketing/reg.htm

you don't need to use specific terms and they have 14 days to stop calling you. in my case they continued to call and so i used the "complaint and enforcement" numbers on that page and reported them.

have not been contacted since.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#153

I think this is great, and though I agree that determining whether there is an "on-going cost to the manufacturer" will be a gray area that automakers will try to game, I think that's a solvable problem. The heated seats example is a great one. There is no reason for this not be a one-time charge. On the other hand, I think it's fair to offer autopilot/"full self driving" on a subscription, or at least the upgrades a…

> The heated seats example is a great one. There is no reason for this not be a one-time charge. if you're referring to BMW, the heated seats are still available as a one time charge. they're just also available as a subscription if you didn't option then upfront. heated seats seem like a weird fit for the subscription model, but as long as the upfront purchase option is reasonably priced, I don't really see the issu…

The issue is it's a physical option that is being turned on and off remotely, not a software ML / continuous model type of service like full self-driving. The latter requires continuous updating and there's an ecosystem of training it. Heated seats existed for decades, BMW added a software option to disable it. That's completely different.

And it's not OK. How many monthly add-on costs can be snuck into the subscription model?

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#155
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You must explicitly use the words “Put me on your do not call list.” It’s dumb, but “If you want a telemarketer to stop calling you, do not say “Quit calling me” or “Don’t call me again.” In some companies, Reps are informed under strict guidelines to only delete records if the customer specifically requests they do so. Telemarketers are only required to put you on the “Do Not Call” list if you SPECIFICALLY request t…

Again, depends on the country and the laws of that nation. I'm Canadian: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/telemarketing/reg.htm you don't need to use specific terms and they have 14 days to stop calling you. in my case they continued to call and so i used the "complaint and enforcement" numbers on that page and reported them. have not been contacted since.

Ahh, I thought XM was a US only company but they apparently only cover US and Canada.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cars are often one of the most, if not the most, expensive purchases people will make in their lives. It's not unreasonable to me to have extra protections for those purchases.

Not charging extra for heated seats is an important basic customer protection?

Individually, no, but as part of the overall trend of in-car subscriptions for these kind of features, yes.

Cars, like houses, are in a special class of purchases that we as a society have decided need extra consumer protections because of the high cost involved.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#157
post #128

This is a great step. Subscriptions errode first sale protections by subscription-gating physical objects, allowing OEMs a work-around to first-sale doctrine. If you buy something, you should own it, and be able to fix it, scrap it, re-sell it, whatever you want. It's interesting NJ included self-driving in the subscription ban. These require significant overhead in compute, engineering resources and greatly impact s…

Do first sale protections apply to physical things? I thought first sale was an intellectual property / copyright thing.

Yup. Most recently, see Impression Products, Inc v Lexmark where the Supreme Court held that the initial sale of cartridges exhausted lexmarks patent rights and thus couldn't prevent 3rd parties from refilling.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#158

So what's the fundamental principle here, and why does it only apply to car companies? Just because you can make a law that way, it follows a principle you respect? I'm not concluding my opinion on either side of this right now. I just am lately skeptical of the number of laws and movements we have that are justified "because I agree with this particular outcome" but aren't sustainable principles to run a society off…

Cars are often one of the most, if not the most, expensive purchases people will make in their lives. It's not unreasonable to me to have extra protections for those purchases.

Not only that, a car is basically a requirement for life in the US. With a complete lack of decent public transportation in the majority of the US, couples with a lack of walkable communities, a car is virtually required.

Anybody who disagrees, try living in the Phoenix metro with a family without a car. Good luck buying groceries, getting to the doctor, etc...

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#159
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> in a nation where, on aggregate, their platform is unpopular Many polls report that the Republicans are more popular than the Democrats at the moment.[1] Sadly, refusing to acknowledge the existence of differing views seems to be rather common these days. 1: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/2022-generic-...

Support for party isn't the best metric for support for the party's policies though. There is broad support for gay marriage for example but marriage between a man and a woman and the "incorrectly decided" Obergefell v. Hodges is still part of the Republican platform. To me support for a party is much more about tribalism and branding than actual policy.

68% of voters support a public health care option run by the government, including 56% of Republican voters and 80% of Democrats.

Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The systems are static ... We only see frequent software updates today because the systems are barely more then public betas. No absolutely not. FSD models are going to need continuous updates. All real-world models exhibit "model drift". Over time most models perform less well. Real world models are monitored and retrained when needed. Example would be when a city, state or country changes a road sign or introduce…

Road sign designs don't change very often. No way consumers should be forced into a perpetual monthly subscription for something that probably needs updates every 5 years or so. Not sure how it should work long-term, but a monthly subscription for a mature system sounds wrong to me. If the FSD relies on published maps to work, it's already doomed. Road layouts change way too frequently (sometimes temporary, for const…

It also shouldn't really matter what kind of vehicle are out there.

If I see some weird looking car I've never seen before, I just treat it like every other car.

Post reply on HN