Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rather than simply saying No tell them to put you on their do not call list. Saying that is useless in many situations, but for a company like XM Radio that you haven’t done business with they really need to follow those rules.
Some companies have notoriously desperate pesterering. I've opted out of XM Radio and Spectrum solicitation multiple times. It doesn't seem to stick.
New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
151–160 of 175 posts
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some companies have notoriously desperate pesterering. I've opted out of XM Radio and Spectrum solicitation multiple times. It doesn't seem to stick.
You must explicitly use the words “Put me on your do not call list.” It’s dumb, but “If you want a telemarketer to stop calling you, do not say “Quit calling me” or “Don’t call me again.” In some companies, Reps are informed under strict guidelines to only delete records if the customer specifically requests they do so. Telemarketers are only required to put you on the “Do Not Call” list if you SPECIFICALLY request t…
I'm Canadian: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/telemarketing/reg.htm
you don't need to use specific terms and they have 14 days to stop calling you. in my case they continued to call and so i used the "complaint and enforcement" numbers on that page and reported them.
have not been contacted since.
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#153I think this is great, and though I agree that determining whether there is an "on-going cost to the manufacturer" will be a gray area that automakers will try to game, I think that's a solvable problem. The heated seats example is a great one. There is no reason for this not be a one-time charge. On the other hand, I think it's fair to offer autopilot/"full self driving" on a subscription, or at least the upgrades a…
> The heated seats example is a great one. There is no reason for this not be a one-time charge. if you're referring to BMW, the heated seats are still available as a one time charge. they're just also available as a subscription if you didn't option then upfront. heated seats seem like a weird fit for the subscription model, but as long as the upfront purchase option is reasonably priced, I don't really see the issu…
And it's not OK. How many monthly add-on costs can be snuck into the subscription model?
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#154Car manufacturers have been into planned obsolescence for a long while and now they want to continuously charge me for their crap.
Vote with your wallet!
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
You must explicitly use the words “Put me on your do not call list.” It’s dumb, but “If you want a telemarketer to stop calling you, do not say “Quit calling me” or “Don’t call me again.” In some companies, Reps are informed under strict guidelines to only delete records if the customer specifically requests they do so. Telemarketers are only required to put you on the “Do Not Call” list if you SPECIFICALLY request t…
Again, depends on the country and the laws of that nation. I'm Canadian: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/telemarketing/reg.htm you don't need to use specific terms and they have 14 days to stop calling you. in my case they continued to call and so i used the "complaint and enforcement" numbers on that page and reported them. have not been contacted since.
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cars are often one of the most, if not the most, expensive purchases people will make in their lives. It's not unreasonable to me to have extra protections for those purchases.
Not charging extra for heated seats is an important basic customer protection?
Cars, like houses, are in a special class of purchases that we as a society have decided need extra consumer protections because of the high cost involved.
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#157This is a great step. Subscriptions errode first sale protections by subscription-gating physical objects, allowing OEMs a work-around to first-sale doctrine. If you buy something, you should own it, and be able to fix it, scrap it, re-sell it, whatever you want. It's interesting NJ included self-driving in the subscription ban. These require significant overhead in compute, engineering resources and greatly impact s…
Do first sale protections apply to physical things? I thought first sale was an intellectual property / copyright thing.
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#158So what's the fundamental principle here, and why does it only apply to car companies? Just because you can make a law that way, it follows a principle you respect? I'm not concluding my opinion on either side of this right now. I just am lately skeptical of the number of laws and movements we have that are justified "because I agree with this particular outcome" but aren't sustainable principles to run a society off…
Cars are often one of the most, if not the most, expensive purchases people will make in their lives. It's not unreasonable to me to have extra protections for those purchases.
Anybody who disagrees, try living in the Phoenix metro with a family without a car. Good luck buying groceries, getting to the doctor, etc...
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
> in a nation where, on aggregate, their platform is unpopular Many polls report that the Republicans are more popular than the Democrats at the moment.[1] Sadly, refusing to acknowledge the existence of differing views seems to be rather common these days. 1: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/2022-generic-...
Support for party isn't the best metric for support for the party's policies though. There is broad support for gay marriage for example but marriage between a man and a woman and the "incorrectly decided" Obergefell v. Hodges is still part of the Republican platform. To me support for a party is much more about tribalism and branding than actual policy.
Re: New Jersey legislators aim to ban most in-car subscriptions
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The systems are static ... We only see frequent software updates today because the systems are barely more then public betas. No absolutely not. FSD models are going to need continuous updates. All real-world models exhibit "model drift". Over time most models perform less well. Real world models are monitored and retrained when needed. Example would be when a city, state or country changes a road sign or introduce…
Road sign designs don't change very often. No way consumers should be forced into a perpetual monthly subscription for something that probably needs updates every 5 years or so. Not sure how it should work long-term, but a monthly subscription for a mature system sounds wrong to me. If the FSD relies on published maps to work, it's already doomed. Road layouts change way too frequently (sometimes temporary, for const…
If I see some weird looking car I've never seen before, I just treat it like every other car.