If countries and companies are not going to have anti disinformation protocols, they might as well outright implement dictatorship. Deterrence is a good thing.
The problem is that if you already have a dictatorship, or something approaching it, "disinformation" means, in the eyes of the law as it is applied, information counter to the ruling party's interest. I agree that disinformation, real disinformation, is being used as a tool to spread authoritarianism and we need better means to combat it. This law, I am afraid, is double speak. It purports to oppose disinformation b…
We steer clear of laws that are dubious and ambiguous because they can be leveraged whimsically or loopholed.
But ignoring threats to full democracy (disinformation) is just as dangerous, if not more dangerous.