Live data from Hacker News

Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

futureoflife.org

111–120 of 139 posts

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#111

>Because you invaded a country for no reason (like we did to Iraq), (except the one you invaded is at your borders and we put our guy at its head a couple years ago, and the one we invaded is half a planet from us), we will bring forth the apocalypse. Humans are crazy, seeing how we're speaking about a nuclear war now vs how people spoke about it in the 60s, it's like a mass psychosis, we don't care anymore, or maybe…

No post body was provided.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who are you quoting? > we put our guy at its head a couple years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Ukrainian_presidential_el... this is denying that ukraine has agency of its own. Nobody put a guy anywhere. He was elected. > we will bring forth the apocalypse. The only country that is threating 1st strike is Russia.

When people say something along these lines, they're usually pointing to 2014 when Ukraine had a revolution in which pro-Russian president was toppled, and a more pro-EU president was elected. That's also when Russian invasion started. Note that I absolutely do not agree that anybody but Ukrainian people put Poroshenko there, just pointing out you're looking at the wrong elections to counter this narrative.

Pro-US to quote Vicky 'Fuck the EU' Nuland.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#114
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am struggling with the alternative. So a dictator can invade any country he wants because otherwise he can say "booh, nuclear apocalypse" and because we can't risk to be anywhere near that, we need to give the dictator whatever he wants? And the invaded country has to swallow it? It's easy to write off other people's freedom. This map is very the reason why Putin's threats are empty threats. The US, UK and France h…

> So a dictator can invade any country he wants Let me guess: You live in the US. For most people in the world, the situation is that the US, and possibly some neighboring regional power, can invade whenever they want; and at best we can offer limited initial resistance and guerilla/terrorist attack once they've occupied. But "with food comes appetite": The US government has normalized, among its citizens, the presum…

Let me attack your position by attacking you personally. That was a weak argument but would have been considerably stronger had you just avoided the attack on the poster.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#115
post #72

Why so many Germany cities on the list? Wondering if any British and French cities on the list but not declassified yet?

why would the US attack its allies cities? East Germany was soviet

To nitpick: Not "soviet" (as in "member of the Soviet Union"), but a souvereign socialist country^H^H^HSoviet puppet with Soviet military bases as well as its own armed forces, and founding member of the Warsaw Pact.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We can all agree that the Iraq war was a terrible mistake, and that the United States has made many such mistakes. Why was it a mistake? It’s unclear what “mistake” means.

>Why was it a mistake? It’s unclear what “mistake” means. Tbh killing a million civilians for oil isn't a mistake, a mistake is like when you make spelling mistakes or trip and fall because you miscalculated, killing a million civilians for oil is just a warcrime, then the US might go on and on about Japan not apologizing for Nanjing for example, or just do business with Saudi Arabia who stone (aka THROW STONES ON WO…

I really disagreed with the Iraq war at the time: it was obvious that it was Bush's revenge and Cheney's wallet that was the motivation, not concerns about WMDs or revenge for 9/11. (If 9/11 is the motivation, invade Saudi or Pakistan. If WMD proliferation is the concern, invade Iran or North Korea before they can develop nuclear weapons!)

However, Saddam Hussein was a genocidal dictator. He openly persecuted ethnic groups which were resistant to his rule. The mistake of the US was not in the toppling of Hussein, but in not having a credible plan to deal with the following sectarian crisis, where a majority ethnic group which had been suppressed suddenly has power over the minority ethnic group which had previously been in power. (The responsibility for which violence falls jointly on the people of Iraq.) To put it another way, either a genocide or a bloody civil war was inevitable with the death of Saddam Hussein or his successor, and all the US did was move the timeline forward 30 years.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#117
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.” - George Orwell [1] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/20274-pacifism-is-objective... this-is-elementary-common-sense-if

I’m not a pacifist but I disagree.

Given that the context of the statement is WW2, he's right. The pacifist Bertrand Russell eventually had the same observation.

Stripped of that context and speaking generally, then I also disagree.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you read the speech or just go with what CNN/twitter/reddit told you to think?

1. Yeah I did. https://www.miragenews.com/full-text-of-putins-speech-at-ann... 2. He says "We will protect our land with all the forces and means at our disposal and will do everything to ensure the safe life of our people. This is the great liberation mission of our people." The key point here is "our land" - this includes the newly annexed oblasts "all the forces and means at our disposal" - this includes nuclear f…

So nuclear wasn’t mentioned. Got it.

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Yeah I did. https://www.miragenews.com/full-text-of-putins-speech-at-ann... 2. He says "We will protect our land with all the forces and means at our disposal and will do everything to ensure the safe life of our people. This is the great liberation mission of our people." The key point here is "our land" - this includes the newly annexed oblasts "all the forces and means at our disposal" - this includes nuclear f…

So nuclear wasn’t mentioned. Got it.

How is nuclear not in the set of "all the forces and means at our disposal"?

Re: Declassified US nuclear targets – interactive map

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Ukraine was a part of Russia then. Just as a Pole I am not surprised a bunch of nukes was targetting my home country - we were a vassal state to Russia back then, so that was to be expected. So you hate Russia for saving you from Hitler but you suck America's arse even though they were quite prepared to completley annihilate your country and all your people [including all your friends and family and everyone you kne…

Are you even aware that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were essentially allies at the start of WW2 who planned to divide Poland among themselves until Hitler turned around and broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop-Pact?

It was a non aggression pact. They had one with Poland long before that. And another with Estonia and Latvia. Germany annexed Austria and both Germany and Italy marched into other places before Germany signed the non aggression pact with the Soviets and amassed troops at the polish border before anything happened.

I don't really understand why the German/Soviet agreement was considered the start of world war II and not the other annexations and aggressions Germany did before that. There was also the Japanese Invasion of China that happened 2 years before that treaty and yet that doesn't seem to have any meaningful impact on WWII.

Post reply on HN