Earlier quoted context omitted.
(citation needed - that’s not actually implemented in china at scale, though it’s a convenient talking point in the west)
> that's not actually implemented That's my understanding as well. > it's a convenient talking point in the west When online comments get worked up about The Social Credit System, a key thing I believe they're trying to do is spread awareness of how disturbing it is that a government is even considering such a thing that, as we understand it, is closely related to being a core technology in an authoritarian dystopia.…
US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
211–219 of 219 posts
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m quite sure they are trying to automate this as well.
your citation still doesn't say much, just that most are at least still "preparing" or have rolled out a limited pilot, which is what I said originally
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m quite sure they are trying to automate this as well.
your citation still doesn't say much, just that most are at least still "preparing" or have rolled out a limited pilot, which is what I said originally
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or that VP of Apple quoting from a movie called “Arthur” at an auto show resulting in him being fired. It has begun right here in the United States and we just are oblivious to these new dastardly form of social credits.
Saying "they" are oppressing an Apple VP is an interesting contrast to the next post over which says Apple (FAANG) is part of "they".
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
> plus the risk of randomly being flagged This is 100% going to happen, so my guess is it can’t be authoritative. It’s likely to be used to whittle down a list so that humans can review the results. Feels like the beginning of a hybrid Minority Report + Enemy of the State movie. I’d watch that. I don’t want to live in that world, though.
> > plus the risk of randomly being flagged > This is 100% going to happen, so my guess is it can’t be authoritative. Why do you think that it won’t be authoritative?
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
> > plus the risk of randomly being flagged > This is 100% going to happen, so my guess is it can’t be authoritative. Why do you think that it won’t be authoritative?
How many people write similar to you? I’d imagine it is more than one. Someone even did a show HN to find other accounts that write similar to you, which was entertaining.
Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#217Re: US Government plans to develop AI that can unmask anonymous writers
#218Being able to be anonymous is actually a valuable thing. Think of people in oppressive regimes. I believe we need countermeasures, so we need to create algoriths that add fuzzyness to our writing to protect privacy.
But also think of the anonymous oppressors