This is a very difficult problem, to trade successfully based on rules. But it's also very interesting.
Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
91–100 of 633 posts
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#92Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#93Working on building a much simplified personal budgeting application. Been done to death, but usually not very well. What I'm making will put the simple and most straightforward aspects of budgeting front and center, and not try to boil the ocean with features. Mint is so convoluted now with all their credit and loan features that it no longer is useful for its actual purpose of budgeting.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#942. AI writing tutors for middle schoolers
3. Paper-digital integration to support equitable education in India
4. Systematic review of resonance in human interactions
5. Computational models of beauty
6. Generating new Socratic dialogues by fine-tuning GPT3 with the complete works of Plato
7. Promoting ADD as a valid lifestyle choice
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#95I heard few song lines from a new artist I've discovered. It has me thinking on a problem I want solved. Although, I'm not actively working on it. Why aren't there more employee-owned companies? And I don't mean solely shareholder programs, I mean actually owned by every employee and they are paid dividends of profit after all planned R&D costs. Similar to the Alaska oil pipeline bonus. Even interns. All studies show…
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#96I suspect there will be a lot of companies in the near future that make AI models with permissive licenses easier to use, along different niches (like I am doing for video). It is a really promising area and picking a niche helps with papering over the challenges with general models.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#97A little while ago, a patent for high throughput DNA synthesis using silicon chips went off-patent, so I have been learning analog IC chip design to build an open source high-throughput DNA synthesis chip. If it works, and I sold them at cost, it would reduce the cost of oligo pool synthesis by ~100x and possibly gene synthesis by 10x. For about 8-9 years now my goal has been to build a cell from scratch for less tha…
Is it something like a 3D printer where you can get a rough but usable finished product, or is it more like a "if you want to make bacterium X produce Y product, you need to do X, Y, Z, W, etc." and the chip is used to do one of the steps.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#98A little while ago, a patent for high throughput DNA synthesis using silicon chips went off-patent, so I have been learning analog IC chip design to build an open source high-throughput DNA synthesis chip. If it works, and I sold them at cost, it would reduce the cost of oligo pool synthesis by ~100x and possibly gene synthesis by 10x. For about 8-9 years now my goal has been to build a cell from scratch for less tha…
How will you prevent people from using this technology to create DIY pathogens? If the answer is "I won't" or "it'll be open source, I won't be able to", consider doing something less harmful instead.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#99Search itself is a fractal of interesting problems. Haven't had much time to write about it lately, but I've pretty much doubled the size of the index and re-written a lot of the query logic to make it much better, faster, and more accurate. Will do a write-up eventually, since it may be relatively explainable without getting too into the weeds that the audience dwindles entirely.
I keep having breakthroughs that make it in one way or another better, but as soon as I do I find something new that could be improved.
Kinda bonkers it's been possible to build this alone and run the entire thing on what amounts to a souped up PC :P
Re: Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's your point? The technology already exists and is being used.
Your name, password, and the names and addresses and phone numbers and emails of all your family members already exist and are being used. So, by your logic, you have no reason to share them to everyone? The logic doesn’t hold up. You can make the same argument for anything. It makes sense to think about the dangers, not pretend that bad logic is an excuse to do anything you want.