Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is besides the point.
It is not. A company like Stripe is free to decide it does not want to be associated with certain services. You may disagree with that, and I would certainly agree they should at least be upfront about it, but it is not beside the point.
Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
661–670 of 705 posts
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#662Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cannabis is federally illegal, sex toys and porn have incredibly high chargeback rates and crypto has this handy thing where since you can't reverse anything, as soon as the crypto you bought is out of the custody wallet you cant get the thing back so the chargeback rates are also very high. Don't believe me? Ask anyone at the front desk of a hotel the rate of attempted chargebacks for ppv porn. You can get vetted by…
If it's the case, perhaps it makes more sense to block based on chargeback rate (that's actually what payment processors are doing) instead of blocking on nature of business?
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#663Earlier quoted context omitted.
I acknowledge that that is the prevailing sentiment, and the obviously correct conclusion. And yet I can't accept that kind of defeatist thinking. To embrace defeatism on that level is to basically accept that nothing will ever change, and we know that things do, occasionally, change. It's not always clear exactly what it takes to create wide-scale societal change, and yes one could easily spend their whole life enga…
It's not passive giving up - many people, including me, consider the social change you want to drive as harmful in aggregate, and would fight against it; and I'm asserting that at the moment we are in the majority. I understand the idealistic benefits of freedom of payments, however, the KYC/AML restrictions are there for valid reasons that simply have much more magnitude of importance (for example, the scale of corr…
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#664Earlier quoted context omitted.
Running a successful business that is intrinsically tied to a well-known or well-trusted institution is not only common, it's the case for the majority of businesses. Which is WHY we have consumer protection (it's not to protect your typical "consumer", it's to protect the money interests of business people). How many businesses do you think could survive a disruption to their banking access? Or maybe their internet…
Yes, I'm paranoid and privileged, that's why a single point of failure doesn't result in me going bankrupt. Can I cry into some $100 bills? You can dish out the hate and I can keep on keepin on enjoying my lavish privilege of having backup plans. The only thing better than boosting my ego is boosting my bank account as I draw pictures of Scrooge McDuck while my soul nourishes on the insults of HN'ers (hopefully I inc…
I'm sorry you felt insulted by my assumptions about you. I honestly assumed that a sober recitation of the obvious flaws in your framing would be enough to deflect what was a small amount of candid anger that you decided to parlay into self-aggrandizing "advice". Instead, I can see that I touched a nerve and only invoked more hatred from you. For that, I am truly sorry! I hope you get less hateful in the future as I will try to be more cautious of similar types of lashing out.
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#665Stuff like this is why I think a business should have a system that abstracts away the payment processor. I use Stripe for invoices, but I can easily send an invoice through another platform if needed. For processing transactions on the web, I would always lean toward using a service like ChargeBee that allows me to setup multiple payment gateways. Getting off the ground quickly is one thing, but the moment that you…
And if ChargeBee bans you, you are still dead because that's a single point of failure. No, you should have several payment processors, and rotate them regularly to check they work.
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#666Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting. What will be the provider you recommend? Any local banks?
I think the best solution here, is add a payments orchestration solution to your stack. There are others, I know of this spanish startup integrating with stripe. In this way,you can have both your bank TPV/ Payments and Stripe working alongside, if any fails just put the other, or the one giving better prices by default, etc https://monei.com/es/features/payments-orchestration/
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#667Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is a "large company" in this context? My employer is on track to run about $5m through Stripe this year, which will be our fourth full year using Stripe. Our first year we did about $2.75m. This year I've been getting occasional emails from a Stripe sales rep for the first time, which suggests that we've crossed some sort of threshold...
Your stripe transaction cost is probably around the advertised fee, 2.9% + 30¢ With an actual merchant account you can probably get closer to 2% or at least 2.5% + 25-30¢ At 5 million in transaction revenue, a .5% decrease would be 25k a year. You can probably get a larger decrease depending on how much risk your company's business has. Stripe's sales rep might be contacting your company because you've hit the thresh…
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#668So drop the Stripe intermediation and just send your customers invoices as people have doing for dozens of years.
This person is using Stripe Connect, which means their customers are people who are paying them to charge other people through Stripe. So they can't just send invoices, they have to convince their customers to send invoices when (presumably) part of the service they were supposed to be providing was avoiding that.
Honest question: what would be an example where I, as a business owner, would have some 3rd party billing my customers?
Re: Stripe has decided to nuke my entire business
#669Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it's unreasonable to think that a blog post has an easier time gaining traction than a HN comment outside of HN users.
How, other than SEO? If you want to share a link to it, you already can.
A link to an HN thread is opaque, uninteresting, and context-less.