Live data from Hacker News

Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

text.npr.org

251–260 of 693 posts

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or indeed burning a model of the Grenfell Tower at a bonfire party https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/06/grenfell-bon...

Quoted post unavailable.

One year at the famous Lewes Bonfire night they put an actual caravan on the fire. Nobody was arrested then!

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#252

For all its faults, I love the US. I can go downtown with a sign that says "Not my president", and I may get some cheers, may get some boos. What I won't get is arrested. This is true no matter who is president. Now, if I were saying this about President Harris, say, when she came to visit Biden's body while it was lying in state, that would be deplorable taste. It would be worse if my sign criticized Biden while his…

I wouldn't be so sure. The US has the concept of "Free speech zone" exactly for this situation. Designate a zone away from the event where all the protestors have to go and arrest those that don't. Seems even more draconian than what the UK is doing right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#253
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

No post body was provided.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#254
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2011/03/02/134194791...

I mean, the WBC is a well known agitator and not representative of people or even protestors at large. In any case, I contend it's in extremely poor taste and does not help further the cause, and actively creates antipathy.

Sure, but talking about the effectiveness of the protest tactic is totally different than whether or not the state should arrest and imprison you for protesting that way.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#255
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

as another example, US lets you bring guns to protests, i am 100% on board with how my government (canada) arrests any idiots who show up with a firearm to a protest. I generally like the right to protest, but i dont want 100% free for all.

When you have counterprotestors/rioters throwing bricks/molotovs/etc. with the tacit consent of the local government, going to a protest armed can be the only way to safely exercise your constitutional right to protest.

What is with americans and might makes right?

What happens when the other side starts shooting at you? Do you think the guns still help you safely protest. For that matter, what use is a gun if someone from behind cover throws a molotov at your face?

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#256

For all its faults, I love the US. I can go downtown with a sign that says "Not my president", and I may get some cheers, may get some boos. What I won't get is arrested. This is true no matter who is president. Now, if I were saying this about President Harris, say, when she came to visit Biden's body while it was lying in state, that would be deplorable taste. It would be worse if my sign criticized Biden while his…

> For all its faults, I love the US. I can go downtown with a sign that says "Not my president" You're still stuck with a rigid 2-party system and a rather meager choice when it comes to electing a president.

No post body was provided.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#257
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

> They are being arrested for being rude about it.

Is this China or Russia? This sounds insane to me. Meanwhile, the UK ruling class is free to gut the NHS and bleed the population dry and none of them give a shit. The British sense of "decorum" is pure bullshit.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#258
post #173
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is actually an incredibly false point. The royal family (if treated like anonymous land-owners) would cause a sudden and drastic drop in fundraising within the UK. Assuming their property wasn't seized having them retain their current station is actually a net positive to the British tax-payers - they lose far more potential income each year in free land leases and charitable donations (known collectively as the…

This is wrong. Seize it. Make it National Trust property. Job done. Doesn’t need an aristocracy present in it. Also The Queen has a hell of a lot of hidden wealth.

No post body was provided.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#259
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citation? I've never heard this before. I'm aware of the westboro baptist protesting at funerals of gay people or other "sinners" they don't like; they're wholly awful people. I didn't realize it was illegal to protest at a servicemember's funeral, though. Does this come out of the Vietnam war?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1388

I'd imagine this law was a direct result of the (disgusting) Phelps family, given the dates.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#260

> The new law allows police to act in cases which they deem to be "unjustifiably noisy protests that may have a significant impact on others" or seriously disrupt an organization's activities. Doesn't take a political science degree to see what's wrong with this law. When cops get to decide what is a justifiably loud protest and what isn't you no longer have the right to protest. Protests are meant to disrupt, if you…

Protests are not meant to disrupt. They are meant to convince your fellow citizens of your position. Being a disruptive $#@t, not only defeats that purpose, it actually causes more people to vote against you. Moreover, emotionally driven teenagers (or stunted "adults") use these protests as a pubescent venting mechanism to smash business and mistreat adults they encounter, like some narcissistic violent therapy sessi…

When and where such submissive tactics ever successfully defeated tyranny?
Post reply on HN