Live data from Hacker News

Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

text.npr.org

71–80 of 693 posts

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#71
post #53
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the United States, with certain limits [1], one can picket funerals and be massively disrespectful. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church#Laws_l...

So? the US is a weird, barely functioning, democracy. Why would anyone want to emulate it?

Not arresting protestors is probably a good thing to emulate regardless of your feelings about the US.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#72

For all its faults, I love the US. I can go downtown with a sign that says "Not my president", and I may get some cheers, may get some boos. What I won't get is arrested. This is true no matter who is president. Now, if I were saying this about President Harris, say, when she came to visit Biden's body while it was lying in state, that would be deplorable taste. It would be worse if my sign criticized Biden while his…

Maybe what this says is that you're not paying attention, maybe it says you belong to a group who US police are less likely to target for arrest. Or maybe you'd just end up dead in a ditch instead of arrested, which doesn't seem better than getting arrested. Bad taste isn't grounds for arrest in the UK either. In the unlikely event any of these people end up actually in court, they'll be charged with something else,…

When later answering questions on a security clearance SF-86 application or other background check “have you been arrested in the last seven years?” would be one way in which it could matter.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#73
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

> They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. > They are being arrested for being rude about it. Got it. Arrested for poor taste. Hard to see the justification for that in a democracy?

I was absolutely in favor of opposing funeral protests when they were happening in America[1]. Freedom to protest doesn't mean the freedom to abuse people when they're in an emotionally fragile state. I think it's perfectly fair to have a discussion about the validity of the monarchy moving forward - and I think it's also perfectly fair to let those folks who had some emotional connection (whether reciprocated or single-directional) attend a funeral to remember the queen in peace.

1. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2006-04-20-060420... - the government didn't directly step in in this case but the protestors were effectively silenced by way to crowds of decent folks with loud motorcycles.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. > They are being arrested for being rude about it. Got it. Arrested for poor taste. Hard to see the justification for that in a democracy?

I think it's fair to make certain events, like funerals, off-limits to protest. Freedom of speech does not mean you are free to say anything you want wherever you want. I can't just walk into the Oval Office and start hurling obscenities at the President, and attempting to do so is likely to get me shot by the Secret Service.

You can hurl all the obscenities you like at the President. You might be removed from the property but you won't be shot.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#75
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

Police are looking for barrister Paul Powlesland who held up a blank sign and only said we was going to write "not my king" on it:

https://twitter.com/paulpowlesland/status/156935177260655002...

Or, more precisely, he was going around with this blank sign, asking officers whether he would be arrested if he were to write that on the blank paper, according to the account here:

https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/man-said-warned-risked-arre...

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#76
post #9

They aren’t being arrested for being anti-monarchy though. They are being arrested for being rude about it. Was the fella on radio 4 who stated to the entire nation that ‘King Charles and his family should be put in a council house and that the Monarchy should be abolished’ arrested? No. If you are going to attend a funeral, any funeral, be it the Queen’s or anyone else’s and hurl abuse or hold up signs with obscenit…

>They are being arrested for being rude about it.

Which is substantially worse.

Rudeness is so subjective and context sensitive that it really shouldn't form the basis for arrests

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#77
post #53
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the United States, with certain limits [1], one can picket funerals and be massively disrespectful. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church#Laws_l...

So? the US is a weird, barely functioning, democracy. Why would anyone want to emulate it?

This is exactly why I refuse to walk. I'm told that Hitler once walked.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#78
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You will be arrested for hurling obscenities at mourners regardless of who the dead person is. People were arrested at Margaret Thatchers funeral for the same thing. It’s not rocket science. You’re not allowed to do that.

In Oxford someone was arrested for shouting " who elected him " during the proclamation of the new king so it's not just about respecting a funeral (which is understable) or unacceptable language. But in fairness to the police there seems to be a mass fervour at the moment and they may actually be doing the hecklers a service by taking them away for their own safety...

And then de-arrested.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#79

For all its faults, I love the US. I can go downtown with a sign that says "Not my president", and I may get some cheers, may get some boos. What I won't get is arrested. This is true no matter who is president. Now, if I were saying this about President Harris, say, when she came to visit Biden's body while it was lying in state, that would be deplorable taste. It would be worse if my sign criticized Biden while his…

But you can be arrested for crossing the street in the wrong place, and you can be shot by the police for any reason, including because they feel like it.

To be fair the British cops sometimes shoot black people for dubious reasons too. It's taken a bit more seriously here (there will automatically be an investigation if anybody dies after police contact not only the extremes of "a cop shot them" or "he apparently committed suicide while in police custody" but even something like "Police called for a welfare check, decided everything was fine, but an hour later her boyfriend strangled her to death") - but it does happen which isn't great, and it is more notable since the vast majority of British cops don't have guns, so this means they specifically brought in armed police.

Re: Anti-royal protesters are being arrested in the U.K. as 'Not My King' tag grows

#80

> The new law allows police to act in cases which they deem to be "unjustifiably noisy protests that may have a significant impact on others" or seriously disrupt an organization's activities. Doesn't take a political science degree to see what's wrong with this law. When cops get to decide what is a justifiably loud protest and what isn't you no longer have the right to protest. Protests are meant to disrupt, if you…

Protests are not meant to disrupt.

They are meant to convince your fellow citizens of your position.

Being a disruptive $#@t, not only defeats that purpose, it actually causes more people to vote against you.

Moreover, emotionally driven teenagers (or stunted "adults") use these protests as a pubescent venting mechanism to smash business and mistreat adults they encounter, like some narcissistic violent therapy session.

It should absolutely be illegal.

Post reply on HN