Live data from Hacker News

Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

engadget.com

161–170 of 208 posts

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#161
post #103

> Former marketing chief Phil Schiller famously said that porting iMessage to Android "would hurt us more than help us," and another former Apple exec said in an email that "iMessage amounts to serious lock-in." Thank all that is holy that innovations like email came from government and academia, and were designed for federated interoperability from day 1. I still remember all the adulation for Steve Jobs' "open lett…

Didn't Jobs originally want to create an email that only worked (on and to) Apple computers? I think that might have been in a movie about him that I watched

NeXT mail was amazing, and is probably what you're remembering.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#162

Thankfully, shit like this will soon be illegal in the EU when the Digital Markets Act hits. Hopefully they'll plug all the loopholes and actually enforce it. I don't understand how anyone can defend business practices like this, which are exclusively there for the purpose of platform lock-in.

Since when did Apple have any obligation to provide iMessage to Android users? 10 years ago? Now? I think Tim Cook is spot on here. Get an iPhone for your grandma if she wants the user experience that iMessages provide. Otherwise, you can get her signal or snapchat or one of the 4,225 secure messaging ecosystems.

> one of the 4,225 secure messaging ecosystems.

And that’s just Google’s collection of messaging systems!

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#163

I don’t get why RCS has to involve carriers. Apple could implement iMessage without involving carriers, so it should be possible to implement a messaging protocol which doesn’t rely on them (but also isn’t proprietary). By involving carriers you’re making it harder (impossible?) to create a client to be used on devices not on the cellular network. I just don’t see the point.

> By involving carriers you’re making it harder (impossible?) to create a client to be used on devices not on the cellular network. I just don’t see the point. On the contrary, RCS allows you to text over Wi-Fi, which SMS does not.

Does RCS work for devices that do not have a phone number? My reading suggests it does not, that there is still a carrier dependency.

iMessage has no carrier dependency, no phone number dependency at all. Kids all over the world use iMessage over Wi-Fi without working phone service at all.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#164
post #92

The comedy of this whole thing is that if the roles were reversed, and Google had a dominant messaging platform and a popular line of phones that kept Apple users "outside of the circle" a la "green bubbles" or otherwise, it's hard to imagine that they would actually do what they are asking Apple to do.

If it enables Google to sell more ads, they will port anything to any platform.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iMessage sends high quality pictures and videos, try to send a video thru mms and it is unusable. iMessage also has read receipts, you can see if they are typing. iMessage works over wifi without a cellular connection (which was a big deal, but I believe carries now support this for android phones) Also iMessage automatically just works by default. You don't download an app and make an account. So for anybody who is…

> iMessage sends high quality pictures and videos, try to send a video thru mms and it is unusable. iMessage also has read receipts, you can see if they are typing. iMessage works over wifi without a cellular connection (which was a big deal, but I believe carries now support this for android phones) To add to what you're saying: RCS (which everyone except Apple uses) offers all of those things as well, and offers th…

RCS does not provide end-to-end encryption, and requires a phone number. That's two things iMessage does that RCS doesn't do.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah idk why people are still texting. This must be a North American/European thing? In Asia and Latin America nobody texts.

Only US specific I think. In the EU, everyone uses WhatsApp, Facebook messenger or some other App depending on the country.

Every thread like this, people pop up in the comments and say, "Nobody in my country texts at all, we all use XApp," but amusingly, XApp varies by thread/country/day. Sometimes it's WhatsApp, sometimes Signal, sometimes Telegram, sometimes LINE, sometimes WeChat, sometimes Facebook, sometimes something else.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#168
post #92

The comedy of this whole thing is that if the roles were reversed, and Google had a dominant messaging platform and a popular line of phones that kept Apple users "outside of the circle" a la "green bubbles" or otherwise, it's hard to imagine that they would actually do what they are asking Apple to do.

They would make 7 different messaging apps managed by 3 different business units, disband 4 of them, combine the remaining 3 into 2, deprecate those 2 and create 2 new ones, combine those 2 into 1, then suggest a vague international standard while rewriting that 1 into a new 1 that's incompatible with all the old ones.

Then complain that the competition is not "interoperable".

(Oh wait, that's actually what happened.)

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#169

Thankfully, shit like this will soon be illegal in the EU when the Digital Markets Act hits. Hopefully they'll plug all the loopholes and actually enforce it. I don't understand how anyone can defend business practices like this, which are exclusively there for the purpose of platform lock-in.

To which business practice are you referring? a) developing a messaging product, then not porting it to your biggest competitor? b) declining to implement a mediocre standard at your biggest competitor's behest? The last major US carrier finally deployed RCS this year, some smaller carriers around the world still do not support it, and it notably requires carrier participation, unlike iMessage. c) ??? It isn't as if…

iMessage purposefully kneecaps communication with non-apple devices. They are trying, and succeeding, to make it extremely cumbersome to text androids. I can't blame them, it's an incredibly successful strategy that has locked me into their ecosystem at the very least. But it's also obviously anti-competitive.

Re: Tim Cook's response to Android texting compatibility: 'buy your mom an iPhone'

#170
post #2

This is why I don't buy or recommend apple products anymore. I was never a fanboi, but rather had some nice experiences (about 10 years ago - eg I am just retiring my 2012 Retina MBP - and it still works, just a little slow these days). Besides, get mom onto Signal and it doesn't matter any more.

You don’t buy or recommend Apple products because non-iMessages are shown in green?

The messages being green isn't the problem. The fact that they take 10+ seconds to send and media quality is straight out of the 90s is.
Post reply on HN