Earlier quoted context omitted.
SWATing and harassment is explicitly prohibited on Kiwi Farms, and the site owner aggressively removes such content. "Doxing" is for better or worse not a crime, and is practiced by the very same people currently crying for Kiwi Farms' deletion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms I think maybe you should read this.
Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
591–600 of 1001 posts
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#592I didn't know about this site until yesterday. After reading the thread that got them took down, I know one thing, I will not be letting my children near discord. I mean, if this is how people act in public[0], I hate to imagine what kind of stuff they are doing in a private discord, away from parents prying eyes. There's no heroes in this story. [0] Bathtub hormones being sold to minors in bright packaging featuring…
> I will not be letting my children near discord That's the equivalent of saying "I will not be letting my children near the internet"
24 hours - 8 hours sleeping - 6 hours at school - [time spent in house] = negligible time left for malfeasance
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#593The thing is, it's hard to feel bad for kiwifarms. They seem to be one of the worst sites there are. But freedom of speech/expression/opinions aren't about defending those who speech/expression/opinions you like but all of them. Personally, I think the site being shutdown is a good thing. But it's hard to look at the fact a few corporations can remove a website from the internet and think this is good for a free and…
It's not hard to feel bad for anyone getting censored/booted off the Internet. I see that "Gossithedog" lives in England, which - I reckon - makes it impossible for him to understand the value of free speech. The US is one of few countries on the planet where "freedom of speech" is a protected right (a list that doesn't include England). We're collectively worse off when the pitchforks come out and the mob allowed to…
If you mean 1A, that only protects your speech from the government, not anyone else (and even then it's not an unabridged right since there are legal limits on what you can say.)
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#594Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms I think maybe you should read this.
And I think you should read this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32712037 And this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32728365 The fight over Kiwi Farms' Wikipedia page is intense. Keffals, a central figure to this story described in the second link above, is now quoting the Wikipedia page as fact because it quotes an NBC News story which quotes... Keffals. If you don't rely strictly on primary sources it's…
Also, a very good demonstration of the plague rampaging through STEM circles. Driving blind might be fashionable, but it won't make a wall one is running into go away.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#595The problem with salem witch trials du jour so fervently pushed by certain groups of people is closing to its demise with every case like this. The advantage of emotionally immature people (regardless of their actual age) having too much time on their hands forcing their narrative and banning any discourse that they don't like will eventually cease when the majority of people will realize that they are, well, in a ma…
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#596Earlier quoted context omitted.
(I'm inferring that your comment is supporting KiwiFarms. If this is not the case, you should probably re-word it.) > salem witch trials du jour so fervently pushed by certain groups of people Hunting trans people and pushing them to suicide sounds like much more of a witch trial to me. > forcing their narrative and banning any discourse that they don't like Telling to people to kill themselves is "discourse" that we…
Supporting Kiwi Farms right to exist is not the same as supporting the content.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#597Earlier quoted context omitted.
3 people are dead because of that site. What they were doing was a crime. Criminal activity is not is not protected free speech. That's like arguing carding and SIM swapping sites are just expressing their right to free speech and should be protected.
Even if that were true, and I think it's pretty doubtful to just attribute a suicide to some people who made fun of or harassed the deceased, it's a criminal or civil matter. If people on that forum committed a crime, let them face the legal penalties. Why should the website be made persona non grata by Internet companies? How many more are dead from activities on Facebook, Instagram, etc? Why is it that big business…
Near literally said he was committing suicide due to the abuse from Kiwi Farms. If you're doubtful, it's because you're willfully ignorant.
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#598The modern 'Net is demonstrating the ability to interpret abuse as damage and route around it.
The pre-modern internet was a far more interesting place.
It was a wilder place, but so was the Wild West. Is Vegas less interesting than Tombstone?
I find it to be a different kind of interesting (and this one is far more convenient than what we had when it was AOL and BBSes).
Re: Kiwi Farms is down across all domains as DDoS-Guard terminates service
#599Cloudflare or any other privately owned company doesn't have an obligation to service everyone. They are not violating their free speech, no matter how long you turn it on every side. Kiwi Farms can host their website on any other platform and get any other service they want. No one is forced to service them. Let's not forget that they have been known to publicise private information of people that ended up with them…
That's mostly true legally, but also irrelevant. We also have a right to criticize them for anything.
> They are not violating their free speech
They aren't violating the First Amendment, which is the legal concept. But what they are doing is corporate censorship, which is of course against the idea of allowing free expression.