Live data from Hacker News

IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

old.reddit.com

391–400 of 841 posts

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Name a „woke“ movie with likable characters. One. Its a contradiction in terms - you cannot be a spiritual scold or schoolmarm and mold a set of likable characters from this essence.

“Woke” or accused of being so? There are plenty of movies out there that have been criticised for being too ”liberal leaning”. “Woke” is a rather recent term. Django unchained and Black Panther are two relatively recent movies accused of being “woke”. Both were resounding successes.

Neither of those movies are considered Woke, really.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Contrast Galadriel who acts like a self righteous dickhead with Aragorn who was reluctant to accept his calling spent and three movies proving himself to be worthy of honor and love You mean three books, right? The difference here is that Aragorn was written by Tolkien, this show wasn't and has completely betrayed the original material. Race or gender swaps are not a big issue, but they become one if the purpose is…

> Elves are almost eugenetically born all the same Elves are fictive and have a long literary history--mostly publicized by white Europeans. Originally, they were described as evil creatures who infected people with diseases. Tolkien stepped into the folklore at a particular time and place and offered his interpretation. Sticking to a tradition in which they're all genetically similar--and white--is also just an inte…

> My point is that there's no elf manual that everyone needs to stick to.

There is when the reference material is from Tolkien. If they had made this show without any reference to LoTR then you'd be right, but they didn't.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#393
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't you think that 2 episodes is a bit too little to judge the entire series like that? The show covers A LOT more time than LOtR did, there's plenty of space for character development. Galadriel was not exactly likeable when she participated in the first kinslaying, or when she ran away from the war of wrath.

How faithful was that storyline to the Tolkein lore? Did he really write a book where a commander driven literally insane by zeal is vindicated, saves the lives of the men in her company like a mary sue, only to be mutinied and sprung by her king for being right? It makes everyone look repulsive. The only win scenario in that situation is if they'd all just sat on their hands and done nothing.

Probably about as faithful as Icon of Sin.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#394
post #384

Well, we live in the age where the story hardly matters. I saw Top Gun the other day, and was shocked at how bad it was. The aerial stuff was superb, but everything else looked so amateurish. Acting was hideous, the story was so predictable and boring there was hardly any substance to the film. And yet it got an 8,5 rating at imdb.

I mean, it is quite impressive that Tom Cruise looked like that when he was 59. (He's 60 now.)

And why is this relevant? It wasn't a documentary about longevity.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#395
post #337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It’s quite clear that that is YOUR problem. It’s funny when people like yourself claim “I’m not X” while then clear laying the case. if you don't see a problem in changing someone else's literature and culture (I am Italian and have read Pinocchio since I was a kid) than you probably don't know what respect for different cultures is. I would never think of a movie were Kunta Kinte is Dutch and is portrait by Chris…

>But in the small village in Tuscany of 1800 depicted in Pinocchio there were no black people, I can assure you. Probably not many English speakers either.

Or fairies. Or talking puppets.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#396
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The fairy is pale white not because she is white, but because she's pure. Curious equivocation there.

Unfortunately that's really how Tolkien's mythology tends to work. White skin is associated with purity, darker skin with corruption and evil (or at least, between the two, "civilized" and "uncivilized".) It's a trope that's carried on into sci-fi (particularly Star Trek, where the more animalistic or violent races also tend to be darker - see the Klingons who get portrayed as darker-skinned and more aggressive with…

> White skin is associated with purity, darker skin with corruption

it's the oldest metaphor in the world

it's light vs darkness, like white magic and black magic.

Heaven is light, hell is darkness.

Nobody sees "the dark at the end of the tunnel".

The idea that black people mean evil and white people mean virtue is a stretch of the modern thinking, by the same people that believe that blacklist comes from black people.

> where the more animalistic or violent races also tend to be darker

Not true.

Borgs, arguably the most dangerous species in the series, are white

Romulans are pale white.

Cardadsians are pale white too.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#397
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The fairy is pale white not because she is white, but because she's pure. Curious equivocation there.

Unfortunately that's really how Tolkien's mythology tends to work. White skin is associated with purity, darker skin with corruption and evil (or at least, between the two, "civilized" and "uncivilized".) It's a trope that's carried on into sci-fi (particularly Star Trek, where the more animalistic or violent races also tend to be darker - see the Klingons who get portrayed as darker-skinned and more aggressive with…

There are plenty of counter examples within Star Trek of patently evil or aggressive characters and races being humanoid with light skin. This is purely your own projection.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#398

My issue with the show has nothing to do with the “woke” stuff mentioned here. I don’t like it because none of the heroes are likable. All of them have some form of sticking it to the man and doing what they want as their story line. True heroes are self-sacrificial and reluctant. Contrast Galadriel who acts like a self righteous dickhead with Aragorn who was reluctant to accept his calling spent and three movies pro…

Name a „woke“ movie with likable characters. One. Its a contradiction in terms - you cannot be a spiritual scold or schoolmarm and mold a set of likable characters from this essence.

No post body was provided.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#399

My issue with the show has nothing to do with the “woke” stuff mentioned here. I don’t like it because none of the heroes are likable. All of them have some form of sticking it to the man and doing what they want as their story line. True heroes are self-sacrificial and reluctant. Contrast Galadriel who acts like a self righteous dickhead with Aragorn who was reluctant to accept his calling spent and three movies pro…

> Contrast Galadriel who acts like a self righteous dickhead with Aragorn who was reluctant to accept his calling spent and three movies proving himself to be worthy of honor and love You mean three books, right? The difference here is that Aragorn was written by Tolkien, this show wasn't and has completely betrayed the original material. Race or gender swaps are not a big issue, but they become one if the purpose is…

"in Italy, Tuscany, mid 1800, were no black woman was ever seen "

Yeah, right. Clearly you've not heard about Othello, a Shakespearean play from the 1400s set in Italy with a black man as the titular character.

Re: IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of Power

#400

Say something nice about TRoP. The thing that's got me interested is the entrance of Gandalf (I presume.) Dropped in from the heavens like an alien, found in a smoldering crater, clearly baffled by up-close Arda, can't speak "the" language, mystified by corporeal-ness, almost simian. The writers had enough of a clue to see the opportunity in making Gandalf's backstory a meaningful subplot, so they're developing it wi…

Do we need spoilers here? Didn't know that was Gandalf. Aside from that I agree, so far TRoP has been close to or better than expected. I'm not sure what people expected here but at any rate it's too early. You would't want to judge LotR based only on the initial chapter either.

Also it may not have been him, I’m leaning towards Radagast, personally.
Post reply on HN