Earlier quoted context omitted.
A good measure is whether or not you feel that empty, churning feeling in your stomach. Another good measure is if you're into the idea of eating something like plain cabbage or oats.
I feel that after a few hours of not eating. Is feeling it or not feeling it the sign that I've reached the necessary effect?
Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
201–210 of 228 posts
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes me scared about this is that it's immunosuppressive. The immune system is a very important part of the human body, and I worry that taking it could have terrible health impact after years of acting on your body lines of defense. What can you tell me about it?
Your concern is correct. Suppressing the immune system is a 2-edged sword - a little suppression in the right setting, is extremely beneficial, but go overboard and it is harmful. That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. The problem is, no one wants to do those trials because rapamycin is cheap and gener…
Off topic, but whenever I think about this, I find myself thinking that what the world really needs is next-level human/medicinal modeling. Imagine if human trials didn't have to happen in order to know the long-term effects (and in a fraction of the time)!
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your concern is correct. Suppressing the immune system is a 2-edged sword - a little suppression in the right setting, is extremely beneficial, but go overboard and it is harmful. That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. The problem is, no one wants to do those trials because rapamycin is cheap and gener…
> That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. Off topic, but whenever I think about this, I find myself thinking that what the world really needs is next-level human/medicinal modeling. Imagine if human trials didn't have to happen in order to know the long-term effects (and in a fraction of the time)!
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the additives I work with in pottery is labeled with a prop 65 warning. The only ingredient is silicon dioxide, aka sand.
Which can lead to silicosis, which itself then leads to lung cancer.
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your concern is correct. Suppressing the immune system is a 2-edged sword - a little suppression in the right setting, is extremely beneficial, but go overboard and it is harmful. That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. The problem is, no one wants to do those trials because rapamycin is cheap and gener…
> That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. Off topic, but whenever I think about this, I find myself thinking that what the world really needs is next-level human/medicinal modeling. Imagine if human trials didn't have to happen in order to know the long-term effects (and in a fraction of the time)!
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think about it, there are specific parts of our immune systems that are likely entirely maladaptive given modern civilization, where people are ~never exposed to parasites, animal venoms, etc. We can turn those parts off, while leaving everything else on, and be better for it (no allergies, psoriatic arthritis, MS, Chron’s, etc.; and so none of the accelerated cellular senescence those conditions provoke in af…
Exposure is uncommon, not basically never.
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#207Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think about it, there are specific parts of our immune systems that are likely entirely maladaptive given modern civilization, where people are ~never exposed to parasites, animal venoms, etc. We can turn those parts off, while leaving everything else on, and be better for it (no allergies, psoriatic arthritis, MS, Chron’s, etc.; and so none of the accelerated cellular senescence those conditions provoke in af…
Exposure is uncommon, not basically never.
For the average human on Earth: sure, merely uncommon.
For the average person who lives in a city and rarely goes out into nature, and paranoid-ly avoids doing things like walking barefoot in dung or wearing shortsleeves in forests when they do: effectively never.
Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#209Re: Rapamycin, drug used in cancer therapy, emerges as powerful anti-aging remedy
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's why in a perfect world, we would have large human trials with different dosages and iterate until we can get the maximum benefit and the least harm. Off topic, but whenever I think about this, I find myself thinking that what the world really needs is next-level human/medicinal modeling. Imagine if human trials didn't have to happen in order to know the long-term effects (and in a fraction of the time)!
I'm pretty sure AI could do this with enough data.