Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

bbc.com

671–680 of 732 posts

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#671

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First and foremost, I appreciate the civil dialog and will do my best to maintain it; I'm doing this because of a desperate desire to find some commonality, not to score points. >> That's a silly question. You asked for numbers of a population that has no census, I stated that it was significant, which is the point in question. I can prove that those people exist and then it's a matter of threshold. E.g, "how many at…

> You asked for numbers of a population that has no census, I stated that it was significant, which is the point in question. I can prove that those people exist and then it's a matter of threshold. E.g, "how many atoms in that falling piano" -- "enough to kill you if it hits you". You could have stated all of that without insult. I probably travel in different circles than you do, but Americans voting from the motiv…

I said silly, not stupid. No insult implied -- we all sometimes ask "wrong" questions.

Clinton actually was the better choice; in fact, technically one of the most qualified candidates in history (trained lawyer, 8 years in the white house next to the president, a stint as US senator and then as secretary of state).

Versus a reality teevee "billionaire" with a long track record of (likely) criminal behavior and clear narcissistic tendencies.

It was a popularity contest and Mrs. Clinton, whilst intelligent and experienced, lacks the charisma of her husband and has had decades of coordinated conditioning of hate.

Hell, I voted for her and resented her for being the only choice (but could safely assume she'd at least hold to the status quo). I felt like she thought she was entitled to the office....

> rural voters have suffered economic devastation from government policies

I challenge that -- re: the government. They have been decimated but by big business that moved their jobs offshore. Anything the government did to allow that was influenced by same big business that effectively controls the government.

And that quiet part out loud? I see plenty of evidence to support that as a theme (and why I asked about your faith).

We are not rational actors, we are emotional responders (yes, there are exceptions but it still holds). Gods, Guns, and Gays are mainstays of political messaging to instill fear and anger.

Just look at the anti-trans stuff happening now: fear baiting. The party of small government wants to pass laws against people having control over their own bodies. As a nod to the concerns in that realm, I recognize and agree that athletic competition should be able to decide if/how they want to allow competition with transitioned people.

One last thought for this pass: I encountered a Trump supporter who declared she hoped Trump would "burn Washington to the ground". I assume she's not alone in that, and that frustration is understandable.

But.... then you're left with nothing and need to rebuild and no thought is given to what should rise up to replace it. Hating government is stupid, as "government" is inevitable in society and as bad as it is today there's plenty of ways to make it worse (e.g., a Kleptocratic Mafia State like Russia (whose head Mr. Trump appears to be unduly devoted to)).

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#672

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you see me as one of "the crowd obsessed with Hunter's laptop"? Unfortunately, yes. > What would capitulation look like to you? To acknowledge the good/bad of each player based upon a reasonable understanding of their behavior. > (re hate/spite): Not sure what you mean by that. How many? How do you know? * I mean that people will act on emotion rather than rationale in a significant number of cases, and that hat…

a. If by "materially moved" you mean were their policies influenced by Hunter Biden, probably not. b. Yes. I don't think the "kerfuffle" did it, but what actually happened with the emails. c. I think it would have hurt his campaign badly if the story were not suppressed. d. Yes. e. Yes. f. Yes. Ok, I read the essay. It's an opinion / explainer that Hunter's laptop did not contain any actionable proof of Joe's corrupt…

The point of the laptop story was not to root out corruption, it was just to smear Biden. I've yet to see anything that indicates otherwise.

I've been consistent in stating that it was flat out corrupt intention by Hunter's board membership, but haven't seen anything compelling that indicates they got their money's worth. That is, no proof that Joe Biden participated in that corruption. If there was compelling proof many of his supporters would no longer support him (self included).

Of course there's plenty of corruption and the most blatant form of that is campaign financing -- legalized bribery. There's ways to change that but one side is fully opposed to it.

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#673

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you see me as one of "the crowd obsessed with Hunter's laptop"? Unfortunately, yes. > What would capitulation look like to you? To acknowledge the good/bad of each player based upon a reasonable understanding of their behavior. > (re hate/spite): Not sure what you mean by that. How many? How do you know? * I mean that people will act on emotion rather than rationale in a significant number of cases, and that hat…

a. If by "materially moved" you mean were their policies influenced by Hunter Biden, probably not. b. Yes. I don't think the "kerfuffle" did it, but what actually happened with the emails. c. I think it would have hurt his campaign badly if the story were not suppressed. d. Yes. e. Yes. f. Yes. Ok, I read the essay. It's an opinion / explainer that Hunter's laptop did not contain any actionable proof of Joe's corrupt…

> what are the specific principles that enable you to evaluate what is important and what can be dismissed as unimportant?

First and foremost is how many outright lies I find in the output of that source (e.g., Tucker Carlson makes claims that are consistently outrageous).

Next up would be getting a feel for the bias of the source (blatant vs innate)

Then it's compare and contrast across different media feeds.

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#674

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you see me as one of "the crowd obsessed with Hunter's laptop"? Unfortunately, yes. > What would capitulation look like to you? To acknowledge the good/bad of each player based upon a reasonable understanding of their behavior. > (re hate/spite): Not sure what you mean by that. How many? How do you know? * I mean that people will act on emotion rather than rationale in a significant number of cases, and that hat…

a. If by "materially moved" you mean were their policies influenced by Hunter Biden, probably not. b. Yes. I don't think the "kerfuffle" did it, but what actually happened with the emails. c. I think it would have hurt his campaign badly if the story were not suppressed. d. Yes. e. Yes. f. Yes. Ok, I read the essay. It's an opinion / explainer that Hunter's laptop did not contain any actionable proof of Joe's corrupt…

And back to the damn laptop -- if there's compelling evidence how come there hasn't been actual charges?

What if the value of the laptop story is just the cloud of doubt itself? The lack of action about prosecuting it supports this.

Buttery Males? Clinton's email server was wrong but apparently a continuation of non-compliance by previous office holders (e.g., Colin Powell). Not cool but understandable.

The issue with the top secret documents that Trump has show zero good faith justification. He was famous for not being interested in being briefed (so why now?), and was not permitted to take the docs, then lied about returning them. All the time though keeping them in questionable security.

There's not a single valid reason for him to have those docs and plenty of very bad plausible ones (blackmail/extortion).

Trump shared intelligence with Russia that wasn't meant to be shared and did significant damage to the operation and trust of our partner: https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-trump-shared-with-...

But out of all of this you're most bothered by the fact that a smear campaign was not amplified enough?

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#675

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My bad, it was the WP that did the verification and pointed out both the verifiability of the emails and obvious evidence of planted content https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-...

Even within that article it states that those folders were created after the story broke and the drive was in FBI custody. That would indicate to me that someone in the FBI likely created folders to pull files into associated with those topics accidentally on the drive rather than on another storage location.

I guess it's theoretically possible that labelling evidence "Salacious pics package" is a critical part of FBI investigative procedure they accidentally exposed to the press, if you want to believe enough.

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest the political organization that actually provided the copy of the drive to the media and whose electoral messaging around the emails the folders happened to perfectly align with might have had a little more to do with it...

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#676

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, so corruption matters to you? From my observations Trump (and his admin) were corrupt as can be. Small case in point: Jared Kushner's business dealings where he's gotten huge amounts of money whilst ostensibly serving as a government employee. I could dig up citations if you demonstrated its veracity if you would take the time to review them. Back to the Biden affair -- I've seen nothing of the corrupt board memb…

Let's grant everything you state here about Trump and Kushner to be true. I'm not arguing against that. Yes, it's all bad. All of it. No citations necessary. I believe you. I really want to know this: Given that your news sources have demonstrably lied to you, how are you making the determination that some things are not important and other things are important. How are you deciding that? For instance, that the FBI m…

The FBI reporting on Hillary's emails only served to damage her campaign. What she did was wrong but less wrong than Trump. Note that the Trump administration actively communicated in side channels to avoid scrutiny. And the recent news about stolen classified information

What do you want out the email controversy? That she be disqualified and/or imprisoned? And knowing what you know now about Trump, would you apply the same metrics?

It's not whataboutism here -- it's the selective outrage that I take issue with.

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#677

To me, the interesting aspect of this interview was how Zuckerberg kept referring to his 'independent council of governance' as the solution to the responsibility problem, absolving the dictator-in-charge of whatever decisions those members made. But it was not asked - and its disappointing Rogan didn't go there - to whom do these members of a presumably anonymous governance board, answer? Without being able to obser…

> Without being able to observe the governance boards activities, the general public cannot exercise agency over their own rights i'm not sure that really applies? facebook is private property of its owners, users don't have control over it unless they can also collectively claim ownership...

Facebook is a public communications system, akin to a utility. I'd like to know who is on the governance board responsible for oversight of my communication, wouldn't you?

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#678

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do you see me as one of "the crowd obsessed with Hunter's laptop"? Unfortunately, yes. > What would capitulation look like to you? To acknowledge the good/bad of each player based upon a reasonable understanding of their behavior. > (re hate/spite): Not sure what you mean by that. How many? How do you know? * I mean that people will act on emotion rather than rationale in a significant number of cases, and that hat…

a. If by "materially moved" you mean were their policies influenced by Hunter Biden, probably not. b. Yes. I don't think the "kerfuffle" did it, but what actually happened with the emails. c. I think it would have hurt his campaign badly if the story were not suppressed. d. Yes. e. Yes. f. Yes. Ok, I read the essay. It's an opinion / explainer that Hunter's laptop did not contain any actionable proof of Joe's corrupt…

> As a partisan

Now it's my turn to be offended. I am anti-partisan. In a two-party system I'm forced to choose the lesser of two evils. I have no side, and certainly no love for the DNC.

I try to align with science, reason, and compassion. That is my side.

I don't think that Joe Biden is corrupt in a significant degree (he's deferential to his patrons but that is assumed for virtually all players). He doesn't seem obsessed with wealth and there's no indication he's significantly cashed in beyond the genteel corruption of speaking fees.

That liberal rag Forbes agrees with me: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/06/10/heres...

Hunter Biden is an adult and his father did not have direct influence over him; the investigation exonerated him of being bought.

Your complaints about the Fourth Estate are selective. The DNC email dump got plenty of action. CNN gave Trump at least a billion in free advertising (e.g., cutting away from Sanders mid speech to an empty podium that was anticipating a Trump episode).

And again, on evaluating news I look for minimal bias and maximum accuracy on what I know to be true. There's limited reporting on the "flaws" of Biden: gaffe-prone, the kept property of the credit card industry, inappropriate lingering touches, a shameful dismissal of Anita Hill, overly cautious. Perhaps more, but that's what comes to mind.

Meanwhile there's a well-documented sordid history of his rival. In fact, I'm not aware of any admirable qualities of note. This assessment is simply from the consistency of it, not because of his political party (I would enjoy having a beer with GWB as much as I disagreed with his administration).

While this has been a political themed dialog, the core question about the suppression is also simple: there exists speech that should not be tolerated (let alone promoted). Not censored, in that if you find a way to speak you are not jailed. Just not promoted, e.g., go buy your own printing press (as has historically been the case).

Anti-vax propaganda and hate speech fall into this category. I've been temporarily banned by Facebook for perceived hate speech (it wasn't), so I understand how this can fucked up but thats life. Rules can be abused but it's still valuable to have them.

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#679

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even within that article it states that those folders were created after the story broke and the drive was in FBI custody. That would indicate to me that someone in the FBI likely created folders to pull files into associated with those topics accidentally on the drive rather than on another storage location.

I guess it's theoretically possible that labelling evidence "Salacious pics package" is a critical part of FBI investigative procedure they accidentally exposed to the press, if you want to believe enough. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest the political organization that actually provided the copy of the drive to the media and whose electoral messaging around the emails the folders happened to perfectly align…

I don’t necessarily disagree that whoever had access to that drive after it landed at the FBI could have had a political ax to grind. It’s pretty apparent over the last 7 years that there is some highly politicized factions within the FBI. However, it’s definitely hard to sell the “it’s manufactured Russian disinformation” because of folders that were created after it reached the FBI and after the contents of the drive were made public to the media.

Frankly I think the most damning stuff is the emails that were DKIM verified anyway.

Re: Zuckerberg says FBI warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship

#680
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, it's an advertising platform.

I certainly communicate on it.

Jehovah's Witnesses proselytize at public transit stations in my area. Still a train platform, though.
Post reply on HN