Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd ask "Why do you need meaning?". Why not just accept that life is meaningless, and any meaning you bring to it is ultimately of your own construction. Seems a lot simpler than continually searching for meaning or purpose, doomed never to find it because it simply does not exist. All evidence seems to indicate that we're complex meat robots, whose existence is basically inevitable given the right initial conditions…
If you put a hamster in a cage with a wheel it will, more or less merrily, continue to run along that wheel until it eventually becomes physically unable to and, in the longrun, passes. It's the blessing, and the curse of humanity, to stop and actually consider at some point, why am I doing this? And these questions aren't just an abstract search for meaning. Getting back to Aurelius, he and his son were given compar…
Midlife: A Philosophical Guide
191–192 of 192 posts
Re: Midlife: A Philosophical Guide
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
Acceptance is basically the one and only key to happiness - it's simple to say and hard to practice. But by practicing it even the most miserably ill and destitute people can be happy. It's also not a particularly new idea, going back at least as far as Buddhism. It's also why I'm not inclined to agree with things like perceived inequality as being the root of all misery.
> Acceptance is basically the one and only key to happiness is it really happiness if you just "tricked" yourself to it? If you just changed your goals to something else when you realize you cannot achieve your originally planned goals, is it really "winning"? And if you give up on your dreams, and accept your current circumstances, is that just called despair rather than acceptance?