Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is false dichotomy that is running around. To really understand something first you blindly memorize - but that is not enough, once you do examples and exercises using what you blindly memorized you get to understand things quicker, a lot quicker. Not memorizing stuff and figuring things as you go is mostly recipe for disappointment. Like in chess - people think that chess players are somehow super intelligent -…
You are making a very important assumption that doesn't hold in most situations. Chess and math are regular domains. They are bounded. There is right and wrong. Most domains are not like this. Ex: art, software engineering, investing, etc. You can't memorize your way to understanding in an irregular domain. It also doesn't tend to do well in non-knowledge work domains. Ex: sports.
For sports rote repetition is basis to excel or at least getting good at any sport.
I agree one cannot "memorize to understanding" because one has to actually apply what he memorized in practice.