Here’s a link to that, if we’re open to differing perspectives.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/lie-exposed-bbc-says-covid...
41–50 of 281 posts
Here’s a link to that, if we’re open to differing perspectives.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/lie-exposed-bbc-says-covid...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope - HN is one of the worst 'smart' places on the internet for Covid discussion. Every single thread immediately devolves into completely ascientific conspiracy ranting.
This is also not limited to just COVID discussion either. Most things that aren't somehow related to day-to-day software development devolve into unsubstantiated, or ill-informed, "ranting." It's a source of constant disappointment.
And especially the things that are. That's what makes HN special.
This was known for two years. Markets are breeding grounds for zoonotic diseases. They often even jump from human to animal and back. The real question is--how did the virus get to the live market? The study accurately says, "While there is insufficient evidence to define upstream events, and exact circumstances remain obscure, our analyses indicate that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred via the live wildlife trad…
> how did the virus get to the live market? My guess is that someone was selling animals from the lab that were supposed to be destroyed.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry this is an unscientific conclusion. The lab leak is more plausible based on the animals required and known and proposed research at that facility. It's simply another polemic. Without information / data from the lab you cannot claim one is more probable.
> The lab leak is more plausible > you cannot claim one is more probable Am I missing something here?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Vaccines are drugs that trigger immune system response. Always have been. If you're referring to the CDC changing its layperson definition on https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm , its old definition was wrong and didn't include flu vaccines, among many others.
Not really drugs per se, but at 50k feet yes that's true (but no entirely accurate).
However, the mRNA technology is new, different from traditional vaccines, and effectively untested. Untested until Covid.
This isn't a judgement or a knock. Just a fact.
I wonder how many people who are seemingly willing to believe the self-serving CCP party-line on this, would be just as believing of the owners of a nuclear power plant in their town, once the drinking water became radioactive, claiming "it didn't come from the plant, someone else down the street must have done it" - that is just about as believable as this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The lab leak is more plausible > you cannot claim one is more probable Am I missing something here?
Nope - HN is one of the worst 'smart' places on the internet for Covid discussion. Every single thread immediately devolves into completely ascientific conspiracy ranting.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The two are not mutually exclusive. For example, some "theories" say that a WIV employee took animals that had been used in experiments, and sold them at the market. I'm not suggesting this is actually what happened, just that there's plenty of room for involvement from both of these entities (or, perhaps, neither).
It's transparently obvious that the Market was first place where it began to spread in humans - so "neither" isn't an option. The Market was unequivocally involved.
I don't believe this to be true. I consider the likelyhood that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the cause of this to be much higher than that the seafood market in wuhan was the cause and there's no reason to trust any media or NGO to be truthful in that regard.
The two are not mutually exclusive. For example, some "theories" say that a WIV employee took animals that had been used in experiments, and sold them at the market. I'm not suggesting this is actually what happened, just that there's plenty of room for involvement from both of these entities (or, perhaps, neither).