> Design Matters. A lot. This is a common sense, but I have hard time reconciling patio11 saying that with an actual appearance of his projects. Preaching without practicing takes away a lot credibility from a preacher even if the advice is reasonable.
SEO tricks from Patio11
31–40 of 124 posts
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
What Rand said. #include
So you think it's worth the move to example.com/blog even if you already have an established blog.example.com?
That said, I don't want to suggest this is always true all the time or that Google/Bing never group subdomain authorities together, just that we've seen inconsistency and thus I'd recommend keeping them together.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#33Ooh, look, an on-topic location to ask Patrick questions. ;) So, about that whole "subdomain" thing, as mentioned in this article. The problem in SEO is that separate subdomains accrue separate Google scores, correct? So if I was to serve my whole site from a third-tier domain, like "www.example.com", that would be okay? Provided I were not foolish enough to also put stuff on "example.com" and "other.example.com" and…
Yes, you're totally cool to use either site.tld or www.site.tld. I'd recommend using a 301 redirect of one to the other (Google and Bing are pretty good at automatically canonicalizing these, but not perfect). The trouble comes when you segment content to subdomain.site.com. The domain authority engines assign to a root domain may not always pass to all the subdomains, so you end up with subpar rankings to what you c…
some URL parsers have caught up to non-www domains if you have a .com domain, but try it with an .io domain. it fails most of the time.
that means there are some interesting hipness tradeoffs
* if you have a cool .io domain
* you should have an uncool www
on other thing about non www domains. journalists always get it wrong: whatever you do, whoever you pitch, as soon as you end up in a big and might print newspaper (that also has a website) you will see your domain with www again.Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#34> Design Matters. A lot. This is a common sense, but I have hard time reconciling patio11 saying that with an actual appearance of his projects. Preaching without practicing takes away a lot credibility from a preacher even if the advice is reasonable.
Look at his main site: http://www.kalzumeus.com/ . It's quite good looking and well designed.
That doesn't look that good looking to me.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#35@patio11: could you make your presentation / slide deck available for those of us who were not fortunate enough to attend in person.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#36I agree with all these points, except with respect to Twitter. There is one case where I have seen Twitter impact SEO and that's in getting a new URL indexed fast, and in local SEO... Lots of tweets about a local-related page from people whose (legit) accounts are located in the same region seem to help for local keywords.
[1] http://www.decalcms.com/page/Testing_your_website_before_lau...
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look at his main site: http://www.kalzumeus.com/ . It's quite good looking and well designed.
What about this one http://www.bingocardcreator.com/ That doesn't look that good looking to me.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#38@dikbrouwer: Was the talk recorded, if so is there a youtube link? @patio11: could you make your presentation / slide deck available for those of us who were not fortunate enough to attend in person.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look at his main site: http://www.kalzumeus.com/ . It's quite good looking and well designed.
What about this one http://www.bingocardcreator.com/ That doesn't look that good looking to me.
Also, that site has not gotten a lot of attention for a while. His focus nowadays is on the much more attractive Appointment Reminder.
Re: SEO tricks from Patio11
#40Seriously Patrick, it was awesome to have you here. You were voted as the most helpful speaker at 500 we've had so far in the batch. Thanks!