Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then look at _why_ you don't have it in today's financial services. Is it because there is some technology lacking that only blockchain and cryptocurrencies can solve? No, it's because in the years of financial market experience, people realise the risks don't outweigh the rewards. Cryptocurrencies and block chain isn't solving a problem, it's just spruiking the pro's side of a pro's and con's decision.
Taking Bitcoin as an example...it's an open and free alternative to those private systems. Sure it has limitations, but the base network layer is there and functioning (with 100% uptime) for anyone to use without needing to ask for permission. That's the value.
Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
151–160 of 339 posts
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#152The fact that the entire crypto market simply followed the public markets in the downturn, rather than being a haven for wealth that people flocked to for safety, means that "Crypto" is unambiguously just another speculative asset like Art (but worse).
I’m confused what the alternative is. If it’s valuable and people lose value somewhere in their life, they will exchange their valuable thing to make up for it.
For years it has been claimed that cryptocurrency represented a great hedge against traditional assets and investments in the case of a downturn.
Like many other claims made about the utility of cryptocurrency, this too has been shown not to be the case.
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
If banks distrust each other enough to want a blockchain to handle nightly settlements, then they are massively exposed to transaction rollback shenanigans. Interbank settlements can be very, very large, and I have trouble imagining, even in the wildest cryptocurrency fantasy land, that banks could arrange for all their different types of settlements to be on the same blockchain.
No problem having dozens of specific purpose blockchains. It’s just a ledger, it doesn’t matter at all how big the numbers are. It’s not real money just a record of balances. I’m not talking about a cryptocurrency, just a blockchain as a replacement for a database table, essentially a different api that ran distributed instead of on some ancient mainframe.
If we need dozens of specific purpose ledgers between banks, what's wrong with database tables running on ancient mainframes, and how would dozens of different blockchains solve that specific problem?
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are features of cryptocurrencies that would actually be useful in today's financial services. The main one would be near instant settlement. If I make a transaction on Bitcoin, that transaction is completely settled and verified and approved over a hundred thousands times within an hour. All parties can trust that the transaction happened and everyone has their money. That's not possible in today's financial sy…
I get instant settlement of cash transfers in my country. No blockchain was required. Switching to blockchain isn't any easier than simply improving the existing system.
Have you ever attempted to send shares overseas? 2 weeks minimum, up to 3 months in some of my cases, and endless paperwork and emails. On blockchains it takes less than a minute.
All of finance should be fast and globally accessible, money is only the most basic use case.
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#155One thing to note is that while Celsius, a centralized and opaque yield platform, collapsed, not a single major DeFi protocol failed during a period of enormous stress. MakerDAO, Aave, Uniswap, Curve, Lido and Compound all had perfect 24/7 uptime with zero losses due to unrecoverable debt. This pretty clearly strengthens the case for pure and transparent DeFi, where anybody can inspect the health of the protocol or t…
> not a single major DeFi protocol failed during a period of enormous stress Was Terra/Luna/Anchor/Whatever not a DeFi protocol?
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#156Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#157One thing to note is that while Celsius, a centralized and opaque yield platform, collapsed, not a single major DeFi protocol failed during a period of enormous stress. MakerDAO, Aave, Uniswap, Curve, Lido and Compound all had perfect 24/7 uptime with zero losses due to unrecoverable debt. This pretty clearly strengthens the case for pure and transparent DeFi, where anybody can inspect the health of the protocol or t…
Celsius seems to have been either a ponzi scheme, or a group of morons doing dumb speculative investment on margin, or (most likely) both, but I'd like to point out that MakerDAO is down 70% YTD, Aave is down 60%, Uniswap is down 60%, etc, etc. You'd have been better off just buying bitcoin on margin (Since BTC is only down 53% YTD). The point of this post is that you can't make something out of nothing. None of thes…
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#158One thing to note is that while Celsius, a centralized and opaque yield platform, collapsed, not a single major DeFi protocol failed during a period of enormous stress. MakerDAO, Aave, Uniswap, Curve, Lido and Compound all had perfect 24/7 uptime with zero losses due to unrecoverable debt. This pretty clearly strengthens the case for pure and transparent DeFi, where anybody can inspect the health of the protocol or t…
https://www.elliptic.co/resources/defi-risk-regulation-and-t...
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
Currently paused due to "extreme market conditions". What conditions exactly? BTC is down from all-time high, but still worth about twice as much as it was only two years ago. Ethereum is worth over 4x as much. Is a two-year average appreciation rate of 40-100% per year so witheringly horrible that the Celsius business model couldn't survive it? Did crypto have to basically 2x every year without fail for Celsius to s…
Celsius told their customers they were accruing Bitcoin and then Celsius didn’t buy the Bitcoin to deposit into their accounts, instead using the money to buy their CEL token that their ceo was dumping on exchange. Their business model was fine. What wasn’t fine was not following it. Abra, Nexo, Gemini, and lots of other companies are business as usual with the same model right now.
Re: Celsius acknowledges $1.2B hole in balance sheet
#160What's sad is that some pension funds have exposure to Celcius. Imagine teaching for decades only to find your retirement pension is reduced because the manager thought it was a good idea to put your money into a ponzi scheme
It wasn't a ponzi scheme. It was just a business that failed to make a profit. Not all investments will be on winners.