> It has a particularly strong use case in Finland which sees long and very cold winters, and was recently cut off from Russian gas supplies over a payments dispute. Well I guess that's one way to characterize war-related sanctions and their side effects.
It's factual. The gas supplies in question were not covered by sanctions, but Russia tried to unilaterally switch to being paid in roubles and were told to go batter sand (bada bum tssh).
I don’t think this is a very honest characterization:
Russia demanded payment on their terms only after they were kicked out of SWIFT and their reserves frozen by foreign banks.
I don’t think I’d describe that change in payment terms in response to bank sanctions as “unilateral” or unrelated to sanctions.