Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Cities cannot easily be "redesigned". Tell that to Jersey City: https://youtu.be/1mC1l8L5aBA Transport infrastructure in cities absolutely can be redesigned quickly, if you’re willing to take a quick and dirty approach in the short term. Which is usually enough when it comes to influencing people’s behavior; it doesn’t have to be perfect, it just has to be functional and feel safe.
You're talking about adding bike lanes. That's cool I guess but you still need a car for every day life. Not everyone is a young single person that can just go to a food co-op every few days, throw some organic produce in their backpack and ride home.
Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
151–160 of 514 posts
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would find it odd if they were not using precise positioning using local reference stations broadcasting corrections over IP or RF. EDIT: Appears GPS/IMU/LIDAR is sufficient, my mistake. TIL.
They're almost certainly using dead reckoning with wheel rotation sensors to get the precision they need in an urban environment where radios are kinda trash.
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Just imagine how safe driving will be when every vehicle is FSD and can talk to one another," Some genius 10x'er forgets to carry the 1 or something, and all of a sudden an entire city full of cars all collide with pedestrians all at once.
We could have the same fear with all these satellites being shot up into space. Couldn't they all start raining down on earth with some poor calculations or coding mistakes in the course-correction software? I don't know enough about this stuff to know if this is a realistic thing or just the premise of a bad sci-fi movie.
2 - each satellite is under observation by a team
3 - how many satellites do you think are there actually? Not that many, unlike the driverless cars we are setting up nowadays
4 - Earth is actually big. Satellite pouring down all at once and you'll have maximum like 100 casualties - worse case scenario if 1). doesn't happen. Cars OTOH are in busy cities. One battery to explode and can easily do 100 casualties
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#154With all of the talk, usually around Teslas but I suppose it applies to all EVs, that I've seen over the years akin to, "Just imagine how safe driving will be when every vehicle is FSD and can talk to one another," I have to ask... shouldn't we anticipate seeing similar issues to this in that scenario? I mean yeah, there will be different manufacturers so it's not like every car in a city could come to a standstill.…
I’m personally little concern about some horrible mistake resulting in a GTA negative friction carmageddon… either through a bug or hacking https://youtu.be/ifTIuA8Dq58
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#155From a customer's perspective, it isn't clear that a software taxi driver is in any way better than a human taxi driver, particularly with (human) driver assist preventing collisions and all the other warnings provided by a modern car. In both cases someone else is driving for the customer. With a human driver (plus driver assist braking and collision warnings) you have the most flexible, sophisticated intelligence o…
> The robotaxi can only compete on price because that's its only advantage. With robotaxi you get a driver that: - never gets tired - never gets distracted - never gets drunk - never gets upset - never falls asleep - has reaction time in milliseconds - ... Of course it has tons of problems of its own, but it's not like price is the only advantage over human driver.
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#156With all of the talk, usually around Teslas but I suppose it applies to all EVs, that I've seen over the years akin to, "Just imagine how safe driving will be when every vehicle is FSD and can talk to one another," I have to ask... shouldn't we anticipate seeing similar issues to this in that scenario? I mean yeah, there will be different manufacturers so it's not like every car in a city could come to a standstill.…
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#157Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m personally little concern about some horrible mistake resulting in a GTA negative friction carmageddon… either through a bug or hacking https://youtu.be/ifTIuA8Dq58
This reminded me of good ol happy hopeful days of youtube before it was bought by google.
Re: Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Francisco
#159Why Google is allowed to run a robotaxi service in megacity is beyond me. Google invades its users privacy and keeps users hostages for money. What can one expect from a company like Google when it runs a service in physical world? Something very harmful to humanity.