Yes I agree, these points are worth reflecting upon. I agree with some of them but I disagree with others, here is my opinion in short, point by point:
1. Debatable. It is nice it it costs less, but if it has added or improved functionalities then each person should evaluate if for their use case the added/improved functionality is worth the extra cost or not.
2. Debatable, for the same reason as point 1: each person should evaluate this by themself.
3. I agree
4. Not sure for the same reason as points 1 and 2, but since we're in an environmental crisis this point is becoming more and more relevant.
5. I strongly agree due to environmental concerns. But also note that a device doesn't necessarily need to be designed to use solar energy: it could just end up using it because the power grid switched to a more sustainable energy mix
6. I agree, at least for consumer devices.
7. Also this could be good, although it is not granted that a private person going with his own car to a nearby shop pollutes less than a big shipping company that tries to optimize shipments as much as possible. It could be the opposite.
8. Not necessarily, also a big franchise of shops works, as long as they actually take care of repairing the devices instead of inventing excuses to not do so (look at what Louis Rossman has to say about Apple Sores for an example, but of course it is not just Apple)
9. I agree but with a catch: we need to better define what this "anything good" is. Because a new technology that replaces an old one is disrupting that old technology. Maybe the old technology was already good, but if the new one is better in some form then it's woth considering disrupting the old one. Indeed we should keep in mind potential side effects of a new technology that could harm society.
Edit: formatting