Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

news.ycombinator.com

661–670 of 794 posts

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#661
How big is your company? you're talking about 2 hours of interviews before you get to the take home. Seriously?

My current gig, my boss talked to me for 30 minutes and made me a job offer by the end of the day. This is at a firm with 200,000 employees. I've been there for 4 going on 5 years. I started as a contractor and have decided to make the hop to FTE.

I'd offer the candidate a 30-60 minute interview followed by offer with a mandatory 90 day termination / probation period or a 1099 contract. Ask the senior about the last project they led, talk through challenges and how you faced them, talk to them about politics and how they manage those, talk about a technical problem they faced etc.... Behavioral interview ish ... Engage, talk, gauge experience and if they don't jive, don't hire them.

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#662
post #326

POST THE SALARY. Senior people are senior because of their work experience, which they gain from steady employment. Almost by definition you are looking to entice busy, employed people away from their current jobs. They don’t have the time or inclination to trawl through job ad after job ad. Where your competition will ask for 15 years of experience and then only after hours of calls and meetings reluctantly make an…

I've tried to advocate for this at my organization and been told that we don't want people primarily motivated by money...

There's a vein of truth here, but it's a bit navel-gazing.

The first truth is that people don't leave their current jobs because someone else is offering more. They leave because they're unhappy. For knowledge workers of all stripes, unhappiness is very, very rarely about compensation.

The second truth is that high compensation keeps people where they are. If a recruiter is offering $200k, you'll listen if you're making $180k. You won't listen if you're making $250k. If you're making $180k, the $20k bump becomes a socially acceptable reason to tell your employer you're leaving, but it's not the true reason you're leaving, because every time you switch jobs, you run the risk of bad management, mistreatment, etc. There's a price to taking that risk and it's not usually worth small bumps to people. When you post a salary band, 90% of the time, people who respond are not looking for the pay bump, they're just considering you before the 90+% of employers who are not posting pay bands or whose pay band is uncompetitive. And they know that they're that much more likely to stay because it'll be that much more difficult to persuade them to leave after they join.

The third, deeper, more cynical truth is that posting salary bands probably signals to employees internally that they are being underpaid, and can provoke discontent and departures. Rather than fix the problem with a long-term solution of unilaterally issuing raises internally before posting salary bands, most companies take the shortcut and keep the salary band private.

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#664
I got my current job on the back of a 90 minute phonecall and had an offer the next day. I got my previous job after a 45 minute phonecall. The one before that, I had a 1 hour phone interview. The one before that, the engineering manager bought me lunch and we chatted for 45 minutes, and then I spent an hour in their office with him a few days later. The one before that was a 90 minute in person interview.

That’s the majority of the companies I’ve worked for that weren’t startups I started and none of them had a long or time consuming process.

I also interviewed with a company recently that required multiple rounds with multiple people and it was not worth the effort, so I will stick to the companies that can decide quickly whether I fit or not. I wouldn’t even bother if I had to do a take home assignment. I also want to know up front if it will be worth my time or not, so not disclosing salary range is also a red flag for me. I’m not there to play cat and mouse.

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#665
I don't know what you mean by "the work being a higher percentage non-code"?

But also: "Take-home technical assignment (~4h)"?

For what? Just give me a contract to work on one specific module or account or whatever. Real work, real pay. That ticket that's been itching you, but you've never assigned, or that customer request that just "can't be done". Give me that, pay me for it.

Now afterward, I've actually worked together with your team on something and we both know whether or not we want to keep doing that. And you've got rid of that nagging ticket, and hired someone who does the things that can't be done. Or worst case, you decide my work's crap and you're no worse off.

2/3rds of my career jobs have been contract-to-hire like that. And the other 1/3rd were cases where I'd already worked with these people before due to something like that.

A couple of calls and a contract job like that should be all it takes.

I guess the questions you have to ask are:

- Are you just not getting applicants at all? - Or are you getting altogether the wrong applicants? - Or are you getting ones that might possibly fit but they're just not making it through the process?

If it's either the first or the second, then your posts maybe aren't right in some way. If it's the third, then you need to look at where they're falling out. If it's the assignment, then that's your problem. And there's an easy solution.

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#666
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conversations allow smooth talkers to run a snow job on you. Having a work sample test provides a best-in-class hiring filter.

If the hiring manager cannot distinguish a smooth talker for a senior role position, maybe the hiring manager is the problem. There is nothing a work sample can provide what a conversation cannot show for a senior role.

I've interviewed multiple people who were really great at talking about tech and work experience, projects, but when we got to the (not so hard) coding challenge they flopped.

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#667
post #652

To those who are against a take home assignment (fair enough) how should employers assess your skill set?

Employers should use their brains instead of copying other peoples homework. Because that's how we got this mess. Everybody copying the same interview practices.

What does that look like in practice? Interview questions?

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#668

I don't know what you mean by "the work being a higher percentage non-code"? But also: "Take-home technical assignment (~4h)"? For what? Just give me a contract to work on one specific module or account or whatever. Real work, real pay. That ticket that's been itching you, but you've never assigned, or that customer request that just "can't be done". Give me that, pay me for it. Now afterward, I've actually worked to…

I wouldn't be comfortable opening our code base to every applicant for "real work".

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#669
post #21

> Take-home technical assignment (~4h) or similar at candidate's choosing If I can get a similarly-paying job at a place that doesn't do this, I'll skip you. Many seniors ( actual seniors, not 3-years-of-experience seniors) have a network and can say "hey I'm looking" and instantly have multiple options that won't have them do more than talk to the team and manager for an hour or two. If that.

The thing with 4hr technical assignments is that you're saying no to anyone with kids, which I'm going to venture applies to more senior people than juniors. I used to do these assignment. Now I simply don't sorry. My schedule is 6:30 AM wake up with youngest daughter, to let wife sleep in (she takes care of her all night) 9:00 AM hand off youngest daughter to wife, who takes both girls the rest of the day. I go to m…

Why is it people with kids can handle a 2-3 hours long interview on-site + travel that probably required taking time off work but can't handle a 4 hours assignment that they can do whenever?

Re: Ask HN: Having trouble getting senior applicants, wondering what to do about it

#670

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unprofessional? You are offering very bad advice. If your work is worth that much, don’t give it out for free to people who don’t recognize it. PS: my rate for 4 hours work is $2500. Companies HAVE taken me up on this rate. In fact I am currently declining work because I haven’t the time. Know your worth!

If you have been paid $2500 for a 4-hour tech test then I'm sure a lot of people reading this would like to know who paid it. Most employers certainly won't. And I didn't say you should work for free. I said shooting back your hourly rate in response to a request for a tech test could easily be seen as unprofessional. If you don't want to do a tech test that's fine but you can just withdraw gracefully at the start of…

It's not unprofessional, it's setting expectations.

I wasn't saying that I got paid consulting rates to do tech tests. I have never had to do a tech test, and never will. But I've been approached by recruiters, and I always respond with my current top-tier hourly consulting rate, with a minimum half-day charge. Usually that's the end of that conversation, but twice such an unsolicited inbound request has resulted in the recruiter saying "okay, when can you come out?" Once was a certain large asian phone manufacturer, who flew me out to their headquarters halfway around the world for a week of consulting, which also acted as a sort of interview. I decided not to pursue a longer-term job with them for $REASONS. The second instance was my current non-FAANG job. Told them my rate, they again flew me out for 3 days, and on the last day we negotiated salary.

To be clear, my negotiated salary from this job is much, much less than $5000/day I charged them for that interview. It's actually on the lower end for my industry, although I'm still one of the higher paid members on my team. I took it because I like the team, I like the work, and I'm given a fair amount of freedom. It was also 100% work-from-home, prior to COVID. The $15000 I invoiced for 3 days of consulting? They considered it a signing bonus.

But yeah, some companies are willing to pay to get the attention of senior talent, and since I'm charging hourly they respect my time. I have my pick of places to work, so why not filter based on that?

Post reply on HN