Earlier quoted context omitted.
Energy prices which have LATELY, MAYBE, been driven by failed attempt of the US applying sanctions to Russia over the invasion of Ukraine. Reminder: https://www.csis.org/analysis/biden-makes-sweeping-changes-o...
> failed attempt of the US applying sanctions to Russia over the invasion of Ukraine. Russia is now selling a fraction of the oil they were pre-war for 70 cents on the dollar. The sanctions haven't failed.
Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
91–100 of 593 posts
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#92Algorithmic Monetary Policy > Dictated Monetary Policy(TM) IMHO.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#93The raise is 75 bps not 0.75%.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
> personal preference is to trigger a recession and reduce inflation These aren't binary outcomes. Tight money does nothing to ease supply-side bottlenecks. It does little to target demand displaced by rising energy prices. If those are the principal drivers of inflation, tightening could depress non-energy demand in a way that causes a recession without alleviating inflation. Stagflation. (To be clear, we're not at…
It keeps supply side bottlenecks from being inflated with cheap money.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#95You can argue either side to this, and make a good case. My personal preference is to trigger a recession and reduce inflation. The easy cop-out solution is to say a "big f*ck off" to pensioners, lower middle class, and poor people and let inflation soar, but I believe that long term this would be more destructive to the general economy. Better take the long term view here and not kick the can down the street.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#96Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Fed can only manage monetary policy. If Congress wants to fix the petroleum energy crisis with policy, it has the tools to do so.
High gas prices are mostly a function of insufficient refining capacity, short of the government building more, I dont see a policy fix here. The market is responding to the probability of an electric future.
Edit: Normally I’d suggest a carbon tax and rebate to low income folks, but that would directly work against Fed FFR increasing efforts and Congress is so pathetic as to not be able to get it done.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just wish it was done earlier and more cheaply during otherwise good times.
I think you would need monarchy (or something more tyrannical) to get that. Democracies seem reliably short-sighted. The personal responsibility of taking on debt is so thoroughly attenuated in a democracy that piling on ($90k per citizen and counting, in the US) debt is the expedient thing to do, and it's seemingly impossible to overcome the electoral price paid for trying to reject that expedient option.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#99A good analogy is to think of the economy as a still lake. If you throw a rock into it, you know that it will create concentric circles of waves. You throw a second rock and you know that its waves will interfere with the first. But now the waves create oscillating patterns and now they hit the irregular shore and pretty much immediately you have the usual chaotic pattern of waves all over the lake.
It's the same deal with the economy. We can predict the first order, maybe the second order consequences of our actions. But again and again we're faced with a highly dynamic system with an almost infinite set of variables and we seem continuously surprised when things get out of hand.
To me, a federal reserve system that insures banks from bank runs makes sense. This sort of FED that we have now that tries to control the overall economy is - to me - at least as hopeless as centralized 5-year plans under communism.
Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Energy prices which have LATELY, MAYBE, been driven by failed attempt of the US applying sanctions to Russia over the invasion of Ukraine. Reminder: https://www.csis.org/analysis/biden-makes-sweeping-changes-o...
> failed attempt of the US applying sanctions to Russia over the invasion of Ukraine. Russia is now selling a fraction of the oil they were pre-war for 70 cents on the dollar. The sanctions haven't failed.
Two days ago: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61785111