The problem with USB-C is that you can't just pick up a device cable and power brick and expect them to work together. As an example, my Apple 96W USB-C charger doesn't charge my nintendo switch. The cable that came with my phone doesn't charge said fully Mac when used with the 96w charger. There is no indication of incompatibility between these devices until you realise they don't work. This is going back to the dc…
EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
11–20 of 1001 posts
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#12This is a positive example of the EU influencing American technology companies.
(I say that as someone considering getting an EU passport though, so I might be biased.)
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#13No more innovation: USB-C or else.
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#14USB-A has been with us for over 20 years. It's only disappearing because of USB-C, and USB-C seems to have room to grow. I wouldn't be surprised if it will still be the most popular connector in 2035, and not just because "legislation stops innovation".
Making sure there are no weird exceptions to a very good port is reasonable and good.
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#152024? There's still plenty of time for them to remove the port altogether and go with just MagSafe/Qi. Which they control, and they still can get fees from. Trust me when I say that Apple will NEVER submit to this legislation, they will find every sort of obscure or arcane tricks to comply with it without actually doing it. It would set a precedent that legislating can change Apple's behaviour, which they clearly do…
I don't think this is the right take. - We already have reliable rumors that next-next iPhone (not this Sept, but next) will have USB-C port. - Qi is not a standard they control like Lightning either way. - Portless phone would be very unpopular (no fast charging), USB-C would be very popular. Apple would not choose to be unpopular just to watch the world hate them.
The same Apple which removed headphone jack so they can sell more dongles and wireless headphones?
I can see them making portless phone just out of pure spite (maybe having cheaper version with port and not selling that in EU).
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#16As an European, I’m so mad at this law.
Why?
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
No more e-waste as well. And, as the regulation moved from micro USB to USB-C, it's clear that innovation is still possible, within regulations. That's also why you can't have jet-engine powered cars on the streets.
Except for the millions of lightning cable already in prod?
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#18As a European, I'm very happy. USB-A has been with us for over 20 years. It's only disappearing because of USB-C, and USB-C seems to have room to grow. I wouldn't be surprised if it will still be the most popular connector in 2035, and not just because "legislation stops innovation". Making sure there are no weird exceptions to a very good port is reasonable and good.
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
No more e-waste as well. And, as the regulation moved from micro USB to USB-C, it's clear that innovation is still possible, within regulations. That's also why you can't have jet-engine powered cars on the streets.
Except for the millions of lightning cable already in prod?
Re: EU reaches deal to make USB-C a common charger for most electronic devices
#20The problem with USB-C is that you can't just pick up a device cable and power brick and expect them to work together. As an example, my Apple 96W USB-C charger doesn't charge my nintendo switch. The cable that came with my phone doesn't charge said fully Mac when used with the 96w charger. There is no indication of incompatibility between these devices until you realise they don't work. This is going back to the dc…
The issue with the Nintendo Switch is that Nintendo designed their own faulty USB-C charging implementation rather than merely using the reference design. It's not a failure of the spec, it's a failure to adhere to the spec. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16706803
Compare that with USB-A where even cheap Chinese cables from the lowest bidder usually work (work well enough at least - you might get voltage drop but it will still charge if you leave it on long enough) because the spec is so simple that even the worst manufacturers manage to do a good enough job, and it's something you can trivially DIY if you need to.
Now compare that with USB-C. So many moving parts that can go wrong and so much corners that can be cut by unscrupulous manufacturers. Not to mention that even the most expensive devices (Apple) don't give you any visibility on what type of cable/charger/etc you have even though that information is technically available to the device (that's how it negotiates power delivery) which is extremely confusing even to tech-savvy people.