Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What traditional sense? In the sense of renting != owning
Na it's not really true, you don't rent it (the name), you pay for the administrative work, you still ~have the namerights, like google.com...they own that name, because they are the "creator" of it.
Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
41–50 of 210 posts
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty surprising to me if others agree, if you lease a car you dont own that car, do you?
my parents lease a car. I would regard it as their car, and possibly go so far as to say they own it, if I wasn't thinking too hard about it, and maybe even if I was. it's in their possession.
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty surprising to me if others agree, if you lease a car you dont own that car, do you?
Depends on how you think about it. You could say that you 'own' it but you have obligations (lease payments) or it will be seized. The same is true for property you 'own', if you don't pay your taxes or fail to manage the property, it will be seized.
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ownership rights vary from culture to culture and from country to country. Even in the US you don't get to own something forever, you get to own it until someone takes it off you to build a shopping mall for example. In most countries, leased property is often referred to as "owned", yet you have to keep paying over and over to renew that lease.
Pretty surprising to me if others agree, if you lease a car you dont own that car, do you?
one gives you ownership at the start, the second one merely "rents" you the thing
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ownership rights vary from culture to culture and from country to country. Even in the US you don't get to own something forever, you get to own it until someone takes it off you to build a shopping mall for example. In most countries, leased property is often referred to as "owned", yet you have to keep paying over and over to renew that lease.
Name some of those countries.
Note that private property rights still exist on top of that but this is why the state can decide that e.g. an energy company's interest in your land is more beneficial to the people than yours. You'll still get reimbursed although legally speaking I'm not sure the state would have to do that in order to seize it. The difference is that they couldn't do this for land owned by the Catholic church for example.
As a caveat note that not all land used by the Catholic church in Germany is owned by the Catholic church, this really only applies to historical claims and contracts the state decided to uphold.
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty surprising to me if others agree, if you lease a car you dont own that car, do you?
my parents lease a car. I would regard it as their car, and possibly go so far as to say they own it, if I wasn't thinking too hard about it, and maybe even if I was. it's in their possession.
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#47Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Na it's not really true, you don't rent it (the name), you pay for the administrative work, you still ~have the namerights, like google.com...they own that name, because they are the "creator" of it.
They're not the creator, Verisign created it. And I don't know about Google's specific agreement (they may have paid decades in advance for all we know) but in general if a company forgets to pay they lose their name, there were a few high profile cases like that already. That isn't ownership, that's rent.
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Free services attract spammers. No surprise. The "free" model is broken. Imagine how easy Twitter would get rid of spam accounts if they only charged a few sats per tweet.
sats?
Re: Eu.org, free domain names since 1996
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty surprising to me if others agree, if you lease a car you dont own that car, do you?
my parents lease a car. I would regard it as their car, and possibly go so far as to say they own it, if I wasn't thinking too hard about it, and maybe even if I was. it's in their possession.
Thought experiment: If they were to damage their vehicle (but assuming it's still legal to drive), who gets to decide whether it should - or indeed must - be repaired? Your parents, or someone else?
(Full disclosure: I recently added some scratches to my wife's car after a concrete pillar jumped out in front of me in an underground car park. I don't need to involve the insurance company, I don't need to talk to any bank or finance company, I can simply go to any local independent provider and have the car repaired. Or indeed not, if I decide it's not worth it.)