Earlier quoted context omitted.
i recently rented a late model rav4 and described the experience of radar cruise (on an admittedly challenging road) to be "like having a drunk lead-footed teenager at the wheel." lots of overaggressive acceleration and deceleration, with all too frequent state changes. personally i'd rather just have regular cruise and something that will drive the car competently at low speeds in heavy congestion.
I currently drive a 2021 Rav4 Prime and it's not like that at all. The adaptive cruise control is smooth and never makes mistakes. Lane assistance is helpful but not as close to flawless, mostly due to poorly marked lanes.
Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
191–200 of 320 posts
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#1922022 Model Y with FSD. I use Autopilot 50+ miles a day, and use it 98% of the way on trips from San Diego to SF. It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down. Also if you're in the right lane when the two right lanes merge- it is totally unreliable, I've been sandwiched…
> It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. Honestly, it sounds to me like this technology should be made illegal until it's fixed. "Infrequently" isn't good enough, especially if it brakes as aggressively as you say. I want self driving to succeed, but Tesla's self-driving tech is just too immature to use on public roads.
If it infrequently phantom brakes (especially when there is no vehicle behind - an AV can sense that), that doesn't cause any collisions, this might be optimal behavior, given the current level of technology.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#193Last sentence of the article: > Tesla did not reply to a request for comment, nor has it since 2019 when it dissolved its PR department.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#1942022 Model Y with FSD. I use Autopilot 50+ miles a day, and use it 98% of the way on trips from San Diego to SF. It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down. Also if you're in the right lane when the two right lanes merge- it is totally unreliable, I've been sandwiched…
>But that said, once you learn the quirks it is extremely predictable and robust. I feel like a self-driving vehicle is one of those areas where nobody should have to "learn the quirks".
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
No disrespect to Ralph Nader, but cars claim about the same number of lives (more in most years) than they did then. Sure, many _many_ lives are saved by seatbelts, but car-centric inner-cities combined with the psychology of invincibility for the people inside the vehicle are a recipe for dead kids in city blocks, and it's an absolute blood bath out there. Sure, there are fewer deaths per capita, and fewer deaths pe…
I'm confused. Are you saying Nader didn't do any good thus regulation is a fool's errand?
Or perhaps more to the point for the autonomous vehicle discussion: that no amount of hacking on the concept (which I fully support, and think is amazing and important work!), whether prompted by regulation or not, is likely to finally end the era of petro-carnage. For that, we need to stop using our tax dollars to build cities (and other roads) that are for cars first and people last.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#1962022 Model Y with FSD. I use Autopilot 50+ miles a day, and use it 98% of the way on trips from San Diego to SF. It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down. Also if you're in the right lane when the two right lanes merge- it is totally unreliable, I've been sandwiched…
Additionally, if you interrupt a phantom brake by manually accelerating, it often won't resume speed until it has decelerated to whatever it thinks its "safe speed" was at the time of the perceived danger, even if the perceived danger is well-past. So if you were going 60mph when it got spooked by a shadow and manually compensated for the phantom braking, when you let off the accelerator the car will still slow down to ~30mph even if you're a quarter mile past the shadow.
This is all frustrating, but the most frustrating thing is that I don't even know for sure what the car's reasoning process is--why does it sometimes sporadically set the speed to 30mph below the speed limit on a busy highway? What threat is it perceiving when it phantom brakes?
> and more often brakes hard and late ... If you have the minimum distance set to 2 or 3 car lengths, you should not be complaining about late and hard braking- that's the setting you chose.
I disagree here. As a human driver, I can prefer to follow someone "closely" (pretty sure I could fit 3 or 4 cars into Tesla's "2 car lengths"), but that doesn't mean I wait until I'm that far from them before I begin decelerating. There's no reason fundamental reason Autopilot can't do the same.
> It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down.
Fully agree. I think this pisses people off behind me more than the brake checking.
> The phantom braking is annoying but infrequent
I suspect this depends on what share of your driving is on divided versus two-lane highways.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#1972022 Model Y with FSD. I use Autopilot 50+ miles a day, and use it 98% of the way on trips from San Diego to SF. It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down. Also if you're in the right lane when the two right lanes merge- it is totally unreliable, I've been sandwiched…
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#198Why or how people deem "phantom braking" to be even remotely acceptable is completely beyond me. You are putting your life in the hands of a multi-ton steel box with a mind of (seemingly) its own and it "phantom braking" at highway speeds does not alarm you? In a normal world all of those cars would be immediately recalled.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#1992022 Model Y with FSD. I use Autopilot 50+ miles a day, and use it 98% of the way on trips from San Diego to SF. It infrequently phantom brakes, and more often brakes hard and late and sometimes people think I'm brake-checking them. It also is annoying slow to recover back to cruise speed from a slow down. Also if you're in the right lane when the two right lanes merge- it is totally unreliable, I've been sandwiched…
If it often brakes hard and late to the point that people think you're brake checking them, then you shouldn't be using it. They don't think you're brake checking them, you ARE brake checking them. Stop being dangerous on the road. This isn't a game.
Re: Tesla’s ‘phantom braking’ problem is getting worse
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
Beating the national average never should have been seen as the finish line. The average is dragged down into the gutter by a minority of drivers who choose to engage in very poor behavior, like driving drunk, speeding, making unnecessary trips at night and bad weather, street racing, etc. By simply avoiding these few behaviors, it's easy to put yourself well above the average. (inb4 "everybody thinks they're better…
You can see this in actuarial data that the IIHS posts. Often, cars that perform comparably in crash tests have wildly different real world loss rates. The difference is likely explainable by differences in driver behavior. For example, look at any car also sold under a hybrid trim model, the hybrid almost always has lower rates of injury. For an identical chassis. Or, consider the brands that have good crash test ra…