Proton is trying to become Google without your data
151–160 of 185 posts
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a silent backlash against Proton, the most obvious is the domain is blocked by the US Antivirus company who scans all UK politicians emails through the UK parliament email address parliament.uk or British politicians are ignoring their constituents, some website contact forms reject protonmail email address as well. So I hope they give Google a run for their money. Edit IF its not politicians ignoring emails…
I've definitely blocked protonmail domains before. The calculus is that 100% of the accounts from that domain are fraud and 0% are legitimate, so it just saves a lot of time to block it. Stops fraud before it even starts. This is, of course, annoying for the 1 legitimate customer mixed in with the billions of bots. But basically, they have an abuse problem that they need to solve. Gmail also has plenty of fraudulent…
Well, I know what I'm not using if I ever have a need for an ML pipeline.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#153> The analogy to terrorism is interesting because, during the Bush-era War on Terror, there was a sense of literally anything being justified in the name of stopping terrorism. The US government was secretly spying on its own citizens. Yeah, Wired, they only did the spying during the Bush era... edit: I guess it was less secret after the Bush era > It's even harder to say, look, we've got to accept that some amount o…
> we've got to accept that some amount of child exploitation is going to happen Funny, that's the exact deal with have with guns - we accept some amount of mass child murder as the cost of the 2nd Amendment. Another datapoint that the 2nd is now considered more absolute the 1st.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your threat model is state level actors the only thing that will cut it is another state level actor
What do you mean with that? From what I understand, there are legitimate issues around Protonmail and its affiliation with government agencies [1]. It’s not as if it’s impossible to find a different provider that does better in this regard. [1] This provides a decent summary: https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#155Proton is not perfect, but nothing is. We need more competition on the internet, and if Proton has a chance to provide an email and storage for an upfront price without trying to distract me with ads or pimp my data to advertisers, I want to support them. As a data point, I have been a very happy user of their plus service for the last 3 years.
The only thing that bugs me with Proton is that it's still very complicated to integrate with thunderbird (or any mail app?), which makes it practically unusable for my needs. Having a tab always open in my browser for my mail seems so wrong.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
Uh-huh. Then perhaps they shouldn't be touting Swiss privacy laws like they're some holy golden shield. And once again: > Why's a privacy-first service logging IPs in the first place?
Did you read the article you yourself linked? > French police sent a request to Swiss police via Europol to force the company to obtain the IP address of one of its users They weren't logging until they were forced to.
A while back on the very hackernews thread when the news of the French activist being jailed it was highly discussed, the source of the data being ProtonMail themselves
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#157The privacy of GMail is good enough, if not better than ProtonMail. Client side encryption also comes with downsides since they can't allow third party email clients to work and you have to do all processing client side.
> The privacy of GMail is good enough, if not better than ProtonMail. How do you figure? Google actively scans both email and drive for CSAM. If they can scan it for CSAM, they can scan it for whatever the hell they want.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The privacy of GMail is good enough, if not better than ProtonMail. How do you figure? Google actively scans both email and drive for CSAM. If they can scan it for CSAM, they can scan it for whatever the hell they want.
And they already do, google and Microsoft both scan emails for ADs and tracking.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#159Proton is not perfect, but nothing is. We need more competition on the internet, and if Proton has a chance to provide an email and storage for an upfront price without trying to distract me with ads or pimp my data to advertisers, I want to support them. As a data point, I have been a very happy user of their plus service for the last 3 years.
The only thing that bugs me with Proton is that it's still very complicated to integrate with thunderbird (or any mail app?), which makes it practically unusable for my needs. Having a tab always open in my browser for my mail seems so wrong.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#160VPN is decent (not as good as Mullvad). I haven't tried "Drive", but am not willing to shift from Dropbox. Email and Calendar from Proton are "perpetually in beta", but I prefer Fastmail (over a decade with them). They are trying to spin debate around "privacy" and overselling the "Swiss experience". Nothing prevents them from changing the privacy policy tomorrow (to "conform" to the rules and regulations). As it is,…