See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31522082 .
Proton is trying to become Google without your data
21–30 of 185 posts
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#22They should take some hints from the Gmail UI. The last Protonmail UI update was just new styles, but still as clunky as before.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#23Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#24Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
No idea if it's a "front", but if your threat model is state level actors Protonmail is not gonna cut it.
If your threat model is state level actors the only thing that will cut it is another state level actor
From what I understand, there are legitimate issues around Protonmail and its affiliation with government agencies [1]. It’s not as if it’s impossible to find a different provider that does better in this regard.
[1] This provides a decent summary: https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#26Quoted post unavailable.
Eeeehhhhh, I interviewed and was offered a role there a few years ago. Talked with a number of teams and employees, they were very candid about what they were working on during every step of the interview. I never saw anything to indicate either of these claims. The safety of encryption/decryption in browser-JS payloads is a different discussion entirely, but you can't make wild claims about it being a front for stat…
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#27But they'll give your data away if asked.
I mean, this is what email has basically come to. I've tried to host my own email server, all my outbound mail ends up in spam. If you want privacy, use PGP
Edit: please don't downvote this parent comment, I think it is still a pretty reasonable concern
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#28Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#29I'd add that the solution to child abuse and terrorism is the same it has ever been, i.e. targeted investigations relying on tactics like infiltration of criminal rings with undercover officers. There's no justification for Gestapo/NKVD authoritarianism and mass surveillance tactics.
However, there doesn't seem to be any plausible way to communicate with others using any infrastructure-type system (from postal mail to fiber optic cable) that doesn't reveal the network of communication (i.e. metadata), and Tor is hardly an exception. Tor seems to have been designed to allow remote government agents (aka spies) operating in hostile environments a means to communicate with a known base of operations without revealing their actual remote locations or identity. Similarly it could be used by individuals to communicate with journalists (as Edward Snowden did) without revealing their identity or location, but only if they take a lot of precautions (i.e. not using their device for any other online activity that could be traced to them). I imagine NSA has backdoors into almost all Tor nodes anyway. The content can be securely encrypted, but location/identity? Probably not.
Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data
#30Yeah, Wired, they only did the spying during the Bush era... edit: I guess it was less secret after the Bush era
> It's even harder to say, look, we've got to accept that some amount of child exploitation is going to happen and people are going to use digital tools to spread it. But at some point, I think you do have to defend the principle that we have to tolerate a certain amount of even the very worst things if we want to have meaningful civil liberties.
Not a very popular argument at this particular instant in time / news, bold of them to write this without a giant asterisk.