Live data from Hacker News

Proton is trying to become Google without your data

wired.com

21–30 of 185 posts

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#22
post #19

They should take some hints from the Gmail UI. The last Protonmail UI update was just new styles, but still as clunky as before.

The one they rolled out yesterday was pretty good. Including phone apps. Now just waiting for the the iOS calendar to finally be released.

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#24
Proton is not perfect, but nothing is. We need more competition on the internet, and if Proton has a chance to provide an email and storage for an upfront price without trying to distract me with ads or pimp my data to advertisers, I want to support them. As a data point, I have been a very happy user of their plus service for the last 3 years.

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#25
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No idea if it's a "front", but if your threat model is state level actors Protonmail is not gonna cut it.

If your threat model is state level actors the only thing that will cut it is another state level actor

What do you mean with that?

From what I understand, there are legitimate issues around Protonmail and its affiliation with government agencies [1]. It’s not as if it’s impossible to find a different provider that does better in this regard.

[1] This provides a decent summary: https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#26
post #8
post #3

Quoted post unavailable.

Eeeehhhhh, I interviewed and was offered a role there a few years ago. Talked with a number of teams and employees, they were very candid about what they were working on during every step of the interview. I never saw anything to indicate either of these claims. The safety of encryption/decryption in browser-JS payloads is a different discussion entirely, but you can't make wild claims about it being a front for stat…

No post body was provided.

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#27

But they'll give your data away if asked.

I mean, they are legally obligated to. At least they are not selling my data to advertisers or arbitrarily locking me out of my account like google. Hell, i'd pay for their premium service if wasn't so expensive and they accepted anonymous payments through monero or something.

I mean, this is what email has basically come to. I've tried to host my own email server, all my outbound mail ends up in spam. If you want privacy, use PGP

Edit: please don't downvote this parent comment, I think it is still a pretty reasonable concern

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#29
This is a rather interesting interview style, it seems as if the interviewer is presenting the viewpoints of the national security state complex ("we need total access to all data to prevent terrorism and child abuse") and of the major tech conglomerates ("competition reduces privacy"), aka Big MAMAA (FAANG is obsolete), but it does provide the interviewee with opportunity to counter those points, so I guess it's a decent interview approach.

I'd add that the solution to child abuse and terrorism is the same it has ever been, i.e. targeted investigations relying on tactics like infiltration of criminal rings with undercover officers. There's no justification for Gestapo/NKVD authoritarianism and mass surveillance tactics.

However, there doesn't seem to be any plausible way to communicate with others using any infrastructure-type system (from postal mail to fiber optic cable) that doesn't reveal the network of communication (i.e. metadata), and Tor is hardly an exception. Tor seems to have been designed to allow remote government agents (aka spies) operating in hostile environments a means to communicate with a known base of operations without revealing their actual remote locations or identity. Similarly it could be used by individuals to communicate with journalists (as Edward Snowden did) without revealing their identity or location, but only if they take a lot of precautions (i.e. not using their device for any other online activity that could be traced to them). I imagine NSA has backdoors into almost all Tor nodes anyway. The content can be securely encrypted, but location/identity? Probably not.

Re: Proton is trying to become Google without your data

#30
> The analogy to terrorism is interesting because, during the Bush-era War on Terror, there was a sense of literally anything being justified in the name of stopping terrorism. The US government was secretly spying on its own citizens.

Yeah, Wired, they only did the spying during the Bush era... edit: I guess it was less secret after the Bush era

> It's even harder to say, look, we've got to accept that some amount of child exploitation is going to happen and people are going to use digital tools to spread it. But at some point, I think you do have to defend the principle that we have to tolerate a certain amount of even the very worst things if we want to have meaningful civil liberties.

Not a very popular argument at this particular instant in time / news, bold of them to write this without a giant asterisk.

Post reply on HN